Literature DB >> 1427043

Evolutionary consequences of DNA mismatch inhibited repair opportunity.

W Stephan1, C H Langley.   

Abstract

Double strand breaks (DSBs) are often repaired via homologous recombination. Recombinational repair processes are expected to be influenced by nucleotide heterozygosity through mismatch detection systems. Unrepaired DSBs have severe biological consequences and are often lethal. We show that natural selection due to inhibition of recombinational repair associated with polymorphisms could influence their molecular evolution. The main conclusions from this analysis are that, for increasing population size, mismatch detection leads to a limit on average heterozygosity of otherwise selectively neutral polymorphism, an excess of rare variants, and a slowing down of the rate of neutral molecular evolution. The first two results suggest that mismatch detection may account for the surprisingly narrow range of observed average heterozygosities, given the great variation in population size between species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1427043      PMCID: PMC1205157     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  17 in total

1.  A DNA double chain break stimulates triparental recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Ray; N Machin; F W Stahl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Aguade; N Miyashita; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence.

Authors:  C F Aquadro; K M Lado; W A Noon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination.

Authors:  M A Resnick
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants.

Authors:  C Rayssiguier; D S Thaler; M Radman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The population genetics of Drosophila transposable elements.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; C H Langley
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Lineage effects and the index of dispersion of molecular evolution.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number.

Authors:  C H Langley; E Montgomery; R Hudson; N Kaplan; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: dependence on substrate length and homology.

Authors:  P Shen; H V Huang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Lack of DNA homology in a pair of divergent chromosomes greatly sensitizes them to loss by DNA damage.

Authors:  M A Resnick; M Skaanild; T Nilsson-Tillgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  10 in total

1.  Molecular evolution of angiosperm mitochondrial introns and exons.

Authors:  J Laroche; P Li; L Maggia; J Bousquet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Linkage disequilibria and the site frequency spectra in the su(s) and su(w(a)) regions of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome.

Authors:  C H Langley; B P Lazzaro; W Phillips; E Heikkinen; J M Braverman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Dynamic equilibrium between insertion and excision of P elements in highly inbred lines from an M' strain of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C Biémont
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Chromosomal distribution and population dynamics of the 412 retrotransposon in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S Aulard; F Lemeunier; C Hoogland; N Chaminade; J F Brookfield; C Biémont
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Linkage disequilibrium patterns across a recombination gradient in African Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto; Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Molecular hyperdiversity and evolution in very large populations.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Richard Jovelin; Alivia Dey
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Crossing-over in a hypervariable species preferentially occurs in regions of high local similarity.

Authors:  Vladimir B Seplyarskiy; Maria D Logacheva; Aleksey A Penin; Maria A Baranova; Evgeny V Leushkin; Natalia V Demidenko; Anna V Klepikova; Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov; Timothy Y James
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 8.  Detecting positive selection in the genome.

Authors:  Tom R Booker; Benjamin C Jackson; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Relation between mitochondrial DNA hyperdiversity, mutation rate and mitochondrial genome evolution in Melarhaphe neritoides (Gastropoda: Littorinidae) and other Caenogastropoda.

Authors:  Séverine Fourdrilis; Antonio M de Frias Martins; Thierry Backeljau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Revisiting an old riddle: what determines genetic diversity levels within species?

Authors:  Ellen M Leffler; Kevin Bullaughey; Daniel R Matute; Wynn K Meyer; Laure Ségurel; Aarti Venkat; Peter Andolfatto; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 8.029

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.