Literature DB >> 1425726

Randomized multicenter clinical trial with imipenem/cilastatin versus cefotaxime/gentamicin in the treatment of patients with non-life-threatening infections. German and Austrian Imipenem/Cilastatin Study Group.

.   

Abstract

In an open, controlled, randomized study the safety and efficacy of imipenem/cilastatin was compared with that of the combination cefotaxime/gentamicin (plus metronidazole in patients with suspected anaerobe infection) in the treatment of 337 patients from 12 German and 5 Austrian centers who had non-life-threatening infections. The evaluation was done on an intention-to-treat basis (i.e. all patients including protocol violators) and according to the protocol (144 patients in the imipenem/cilastatin group and 124 in the cefotaxime/gentamicin group). No significant differences were seen between the two treatment groups in terms of the clinical and bacteriological outcome. The frequency of infusion intolerance and thrombophlebitis was low in both groups (< 2%). The overall rate of adverse events was comparable in the two groups, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea being the most frequent events. Nephrotoxicity, indicated by an increase in serum creatinine, was significantly higher in the cefotaxime/gentamicin group. Imipenem/cilastatin was shown to be as effective as cefotaxime/gentamicin (metronidazole) and appears to be well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1425726     DOI: 10.1007/bf01989971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  23 in total

1.  Imipenem/cilastatin versus amikacin plus piperacillin in the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients: a prospective, randomized multi-clinic study.

Authors:  S R Norrby; B Vandercam; T Louie; V Runde; B Norberg; M Anniko; F Andrien; M Baudrihaye; E Bow; L A Burman
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1987

2.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Randomized trial of imipenem/cilastatin versus gentamicin and clindamycin in mixed flora infections.

Authors:  J S Solomkin; W K Fant; J O Rivera; J W Alexander
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-06-07       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  In vitro activity of imipenem--a review.

Authors:  I Braveny
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Occurrence and expression of imipemide (N-formimidoyl thienamycin) resistance in clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  R M Blumenthal; R Raeder; C D Takemoto; E H Freimer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  What is the cost of nephrotoxicity associated with aminoglycosides?

Authors:  J M Eisenberg; H Koffer; H A Glick; M L Connell; L E Loss; G H Talbot; N H Shusterman; B L Strom
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of obstetric and gynecologic infections: a review of worldwide experience.

Authors:  R L Sweet
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug

8.  Imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a review of worldwide experience.

Authors:  L Kager; C E Nord
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug

9.  Factors predisposing to seizures in seriously ill infected patients receiving antibiotics: experience with imipenem/cilastatin.

Authors:  G Calandra; E Lydick; J Carrigan; L Weiss; H Guess
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 10.  Antibacterial activity of imipenem: the first thienamycin antibiotic.

Authors:  H Kropp; L Gerckens; J G Sundelof; F M Kahan
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Adi Lador; Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-07

Review 3.  Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Ishay Benuri-Silbiger; Karla Soares-Weiser; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.