Literature DB >> 1425655

Effects on efficiency in repetitive lifting of load and frequency combinations at a constant total power output.

M P de Looze1, H M Toussaint, R J Nibbelke, H A Eelderink.   

Abstract

Boxes were lifted and lowered repetitively at three different combinations of load and frequency. These combinations were chosen such that the total mechanical power generated was constant. Effects of the varying load or frequency conditions (but constant total mechanical power) on the rate of energy expenditure (M) and on the mechanical efficiency (ME) were measured. Mechanical power was determined from film analysis and separated into external power (generated to lift the load) and internal power (to raise the lifter's body mass). The M was determined from oxygen consumption measurements. The ME was calculated in two ways, depending on the definition of mechanical power, including either the external power only (MEext) or the total power output (MEtot). Despite a constant total mechanical power, M increased at higher loads and lower frequencies. This might be explained by the increasing isometric force required in postural and load control. The M increase resulted in a decrease of MEtot. However, at higher loads and lower frequencies MEext increased, indicating that more external work can be done at the same energy costs at higher loads or lower frequencies, which could be of interest from the point of view of occupational physiology. It would seem that at higher loads or lower frequencies the increased costs for isometric muscle action do not outweigh the benefit of raising the body less frequently. Furthermore, it was found that the MEext in lifting was much lower than the values reported for other kinds of activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1425655     DOI: 10.1007/bf00243516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  16 in total

1.  Efficiency and effectiveness of stoop and squat lifting at different frequencies.

Authors:  E Welbergen; H C Kemper; J J Knibbe; H M Toussaint; L Clysen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Developing norms for manual carrying tasks using mechanical efficiency as the optimization criterion.

Authors:  S P Dutta; S Taboun
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Maximal aerobic capacity for repetitive lifting: comparison with three standard exercise testing modes.

Authors:  M A Sharp; E Harman; J A Vogel; J J Knapik; S J Legg
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988

4.  Physiological problems in repetitive lifting with special reference to tolerance limits to the maximum lifting frequency.

Authors:  K Jorgensen; E Poulsen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  The relationship between mechanical and physiological energy estimates.

Authors:  K R Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  A physiological study of the repetitive lifting capabilities of healthy young males.

Authors:  S J Legg; C M Pateman
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  The physiological cost of three different methods of lifting in sagittal and lateral planes.

Authors:  S Kumar
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  The efficiency of human movement--a statement of the problem.

Authors:  P R Cavanagh; R Kram
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Exercise efficiency: validity of base-line subtractions.

Authors:  W N Stainbsy; L B Gladden; J K Barclay; B A Wilson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1980-03

10.  Analysis of loads on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A B Schultz; G B Andersson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mechanically corrected EMG for the continuous estimation of erector spinae muscle loading during repetitive lifting.

Authors:  J R Potvin; R W Norman; S M McGill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

2.  Dissociated oxygen uptake response to an incremental intermittent repetitive lifting and lowering exercise in humans.

Authors:  D A Commissaris; H M Toussaint
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

3.  Influence of lifting technique on perceptual and cardiovascular responses to submaximal repetitive lifting.

Authors:  K B Hagen; K Harms-Ringdahl; J Hallén
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.