Literature DB >> 1424584

Clinical, immunological and bacteriological evaluation of adverse reactions to skin-penetrating titanium implants in the head and neck region.

K M Holgers1, G Roupe, A Tjellström, L M Bjursten.   

Abstract

Between 1977 and October 1989, 445 patients have been treated with bone-anchored skin-penetrating titanium implants for anchorage of facial prostheses or bone-conducting hearing aids, at the Ear, Nose and Throat Department at Sahlgren's Hospital in Gothenburg. The majority of patients had no adverse skin reactions, while a few patients were responsible for the majority of the adverse reactions. The aim of our study was to analyse differences between these groups. We started a clinical study on 9 patients with a clinical history of adverse skin reactions around the titanium implants and 9 patients without adverse skin reactions were used as controls. None of the patients had delayed hypersensitivity to titanium. Microbiological analyses showed that when there was clinical irritation, Staphylococcus aureus could be isolated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1424584     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb05189.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  15 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review on skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in relation to surgical techniques.

Authors:  Shwan Mohamad; Imran Khan; S Y Hey; S S Musheer Hussain
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Prosthetic reconstruction of the auricle: indications, techniques, and results.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Giot; Daniel Labbé; Eric Soubeyrand; Régine Pacini; Marie-Reine Guillou-Jamard; Jean-François Compère; Hervé Bénateau
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  [Craniofacial prostheses for facial defects].

Authors:  P A Federspil
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Minimal immunological effects on workers with prolonged low exposure to inorganic mercury.

Authors:  L Soleo; A Vacca; L Vimercati; S Bruno; M Di Loreto; C Zocchetti; R Di Stefano; G Candilio; G Lasorsa; G Franco; V Foa
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 5.  Diagnostic tests for titanium hypersensitivity in implant dentistry: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lena Katharina Müller-Heupt; Eik Schiegnitz; Sebahat Kaya; Elisabeth Jacobi-Gresser; Peer Wolfgang Kämmerer; Bilal Al-Nawas
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-07-11

6.  Simplified technique without skin flap for the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implant.

Authors:  R Bovo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 7.  Hypersensitivity to titanium: a less explored area of research.

Authors:  Vasantha Vijayaraghavan; Ajay V Sabane; K Tejas
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-07-13

8.  Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects.

Authors:  Philipp A Federspil
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

9.  A review of the biologic effects of spine implant debris: Fact from fiction.

Authors:  Nadim James Hallab
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2009-12-01

10.  Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Christine A den Besten; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.