Literature DB >> 1422747

Assessment of stripping the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins.

S Sarin1, J H Scurr, P D Coleridge Smith.   

Abstract

Stripping of the long saphenous vein (LSV) may prevent recurrence of varices, although this has not been demonstrated using objective criteria. The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of LSV stripping, from groin to upper calf, to saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) ligation prevents residual reflux, and whether LSV stripping to the upper calf results in greater neurological complications. Sixty-nine patients with primary varicose veins, LSV reflux and SFJ incompetence, confirmed by duplex ultrasonography and photoplethysmography, were studied. A total of 105 limbs were treated by SFJ ligation and avulsion of varices; patients were randomized to undergo stripping of the LSV to the upper calf (n = 49) or no additional treatment (n = 56). Three months after surgery all patients were examined clinically, by duplex ultrasonography and by photoplethysmographic tests of venous function, to establish the extent of persisting varices. Fewer persisting incompetent LSVs in the calf were found when the LSV was stripped (n = 9) than after SFJ ligation alone (n = 25) (P < 0.01). Photoplethysmographic refilling times were improved to a similar extent in both groups after surgery but were lower in those who had residual LSV reflux (P < 0.05). Six limbs developed paraesthesia in the distribution of the saphenous nerve: two in the group that were stripped and four in those that were not. These data suggest that LSV reflux is more completely abolished by combining LSV stripping with SFJ ligation; stripping the LSV to the upper calf does not result in a higher incidence of injury to the saphenous nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1422747     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800790911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  17 in total

1.  A survey of the current management of varicose veins by members of the Vascular Surgical Society.

Authors:  T A Lees; J D Beard; B M Ridler; T Szymanska
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Complications following re-exploration of the groin for recurrent varicose veins.

Authors:  A Hayden; J Holdsworth
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Significance of Reflux Abolition at the Saphenofemoral Junction in Connection with Stripping and Ablative Methods.

Authors:  Cestmir Recek
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-03-23

4.  Treatment of primary varicose veins: an assessment of the combination of high saphenous ligation and sclerotherapy.

Authors:  M Ishikawa; N Morimoto; T Sasajima; Y Kubo; T Nozaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Varicose vein surgery.

Authors:  Michael Ombrellino; Lowell S Kabnick
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Optimising a varicose vein service to reduce recurrence.

Authors:  E P Turton; S McKenzie; M J Weston; D C Berridge; D J Scott
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  A novel biomimetic analysis system for quantitative characterisation of sclerosing foams used for the treatment of varicose veins.

Authors:  Dario Carugo; Dyan N Ankrett; Vincent O'Byrne; Sean Willis; David D I Wright; Andrew L Lewis; Martyn Hill; Xunli Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Duplex scanning may be used selectively in patients with primary varicose veins.

Authors:  P J Kent; M J Weston
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Responsiveness of the SF-36 and a condition-specific measure of health for patients with varicose veins.

Authors:  A M Garratt; D A Ruta; M I Abdalla; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Surgical treatment of varicose veins: effect of rationing.

Authors:  Mark R E Harris; R Justin Davies; Suki Brown; Stephen M Jones; Paul S Eyers; John F Chester
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.