Literature DB >> 1421456

Predictability and reliability of hearing aid benefit measured using the PHAB.

R M Cox1, I M Rivera.   

Abstract

This investigation explored the extent to which self-assessed hearing aid benefit measured by the Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (PHAB) could be predicted from adaptation to hearing loss and/or from communication difficulties reported without amplification. Adaptation to hearing loss was measured using 13 scales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired (CPHI). These were combined to produce three composite CPHI scores. Results from 58 experienced hearing aid wearers indicated that benefit was significantly related to magnitude of unaided difficulties for all seven PHAB subscales. In addition, one of the three composite CPHI scores contributed to benefit prediction for the two sound perception subscales of the PHAB. Test-retest reliability of PHAB subscale scores was evaluated for 28 subjects using correlations and difference distributions. Reliability was found to be consistent with previous studies but modest. Critical differences were large compared with the anticipated size of benefit differences due to, for example, different hearing aid prescriptions. It is concluded that the PHAB is best suited for group research: when used for individual subjects, the PHAB may not be sensitive enough to detect important differences between hearing aid conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1421456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  10 in total

1.  Directional hearing AIDS.

Authors:  T A Ricketts
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-12

2.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

3.  Outcome measures in the hearing aid fitting/selection process.

Authors:  B E Weinstein
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-12

4.  Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services: some uses, users, and options.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

5.  Microcomputer applications for hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  R de Jonge
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1996-09

Review 6.  A systematic review of studies measuring and reporting hearing aid usage in older adults since 1999: a descriptive summary of measurement tools.

Authors:  Elvira Perez; Barrie A Edmonds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Clinical Trials and Outcome Measures in Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro; William M Whitmer; Antje Heinrich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-05

8.  Evaluation of hearing aid benefit through a new questionnaire: CISQ (Complete Intelligibility Spatiality Quality).

Authors:  P Giordano; P Argentero; A Canale; M Lacilla; R Albera
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  The development and standardization of Self-assessment for Hearing Screening of the Elderly.

Authors:  Gibbeum Kim; Wondo Na; Gungu Kim; Woojae Han; Jinsook Kim
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  A Rare Natural Benzo[k,l]xanthene as a Turn-Off Fluorescent Sensor for Cu2+ Ion.

Authors:  Giuseppe Floresta; Nunzio Cardullo; Carmela Spatafora; Antonio Rescifina; Corrado Tringali
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.