Literature DB >> 1418201

Effusions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the ligament augmentation device.

H Yamamoto1, T Ishibashi, T Muneta, K Furuya, T Mizuta.   

Abstract

Persistent effusions occurred in 4.3% (seven patients) of 164 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an autograft augmented with the ligament augmentation device (LAD) between 1986 and 1989. No bacteria were cultured from the joint fluid. The radiograph in each case showed a tibial drill hole located anteriorly or anterolaterally. Arthroscopy confirmed an abraded LAD in six cases and breakage of the LAD in one case and impingement of the graft on the femoral condyle during extension. Under polarized light microscopy, the histology of the synovia showed foreign body giant cells in one case and particles among the proliferative cells in four cases. The effusions subsided in two cases after notchplasty and in five cases after removal of the LAD. Impingement of the graft on the femoral condyle due to incorrect positioning of the tibial drill hole presumably produced particles that induced synovitis and effusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1418201     DOI: 10.1016/0749-8063(92)90060-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of augmented and non-augmented anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  G Stutz; A Boss; A Gächter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The biomechanics of biodegradable versus titanium interference screw fixation for anterior cruciate ligament augmentation and reconstruction.

Authors:  Max Ettinger; Diana Schumacher; Tilman Calliess; Antonios Dratzidis; Marco Ezechieli; Christof Hurschler; Christoph Becher
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon D S Newman; Henry D E Atkinson; Charles A Willis-Owen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  In vivo evaluation of intra-articular protection in a novel model of canine cranial cruciate ligament mid-substance elongation injury.

Authors:  Mandi J Lopez; Sandra O Robinson; Margaret M Quinn; Giselle Hosgood; Mark D Markel
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.495

5.  Evaluation of anterior cruciate reconstruction reinforced by the Kennedy ligament augmentation device. An arthroscopic and histological study.

Authors:  S Asahina; H Yamamoto; T Muneta; T Ishibashi; K Furuya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Freehand Anatomic Transtibial Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Naser M Selim; Ehab R Badawy; Kamel Youssef
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-01-23

Review 7.  Twenty-Year Experience of a Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Takeshi Muneta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-05-18

8.  RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF BONE TUNNEL POSITION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE OPEN TECHNIQUE AND ARTHROSCOPY VIA AN ANTEROMEDIAL PORTAL.

Authors:  Jean Marcel Dambrós; Rodrigo Florêncio; Osmar Valadão Lopes Júnior; André Kuhn; José Saggin; Leandro de Freitas Spinelli
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-08

Review 9.  Patellar tendon versus artificial grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  DingYuan Fan; Jia Ma; Lei Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.