Literature DB >> 1416673

Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: our first 200 patients.

M J Hershman1, R D Rosin.   

Abstract

A series of 200 consecutive patients were considered for laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy was attempted in 195 cases and was performed in 192 cases. Laparoscopy was performed in five patients, but laparoscopic cholecystectomy was not attempted owing to dense adhesions (3), cholangiocarcinoma (1) and an absent gallbladder (1). The indications for operation were symptomatic gallstones which included biliary colic (142), acute cholecystitis (49) and gallstone pancreatitis (9). The median duration of operation was 75 min. Operative cholangiography was attempted in 151 (77%) of cases, and was successful in 85% of attempts. Laparoscopic common bile duct visualisation was performed three times with successful stone extraction twice. The other common bile duct was normal. The median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 2 days, for return to normal activity 6 days, and for return to work 10 days. Mean analgesic and antiemetic requirements were approximately one-third of those for open cholecystectomy. Of the patients, 94% reported good or excellent overall satisfaction and 96% reported excellent cosmetic results. Seven complications occurred (4%). Three patients had immediate conversion to laparotomy owing to haemorrhage (2) and gallbladder rupture (1). Four patients required laparotomy for postoperative complications (common bile duct damage, slipped clips from cystic duct, perforated duodenum and leaking accessory hepatic duct). No complications occurred in the last 140 cases. These data suggest that laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy reduces the discomfort of laparotomy and allows a shorter postoperative recovery. The operation has a learning curve, but will ultimately be applicable to the majority of patients with symptomatic gallstones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1416673      PMCID: PMC2497622     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dundee technique.

Authors:  L K Nathanson; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; F Dubois; J Mouiel; P Mouret; H Becker; G Buess; M Trede; H Troidl
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C Wastell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-02-09

4.  Complications of cholecystectomy in district general hospitals.

Authors:  N A Habib; C L Foo; R el-Masry; O Gouli; S Cox; R Salem; B Todd; I S Benjamin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1990-05

5.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A new absorbable ligating clip for use in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Allan; M J Cooper; D J Leaper
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1984-01

7.  Prevalence of gallstones in a Danish population.

Authors:  T Jørgensen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Prevalence of gallstones in a Norwegian population.

Authors:  I Glambek; G Kvaale; B Arnesjö; O Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 9.  New trends in gallstone management.

Authors:  S Cheslyn-Curtis; R C Russell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Gallbladder disease. Prevalence in a South Wales industrial town.

Authors:  D Bainton; G T Davies; K T Evans; I H Gravelle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  An unusual complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C McGuiness; A Choy; H Gajraj
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Leicester: an audit of 555 patients.

Authors:  I Birdi; T M Hunt; P S Veitch; M Armon; P Jervis; C Barr
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England and Wales: results of an audit by the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

Authors:  D Dunn; R Nair; S Fowler; R McCloy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.