Literature DB >> 1416427

Use of the Blasius resistance formula to estimate the effective diameter of endotracheal tubes.

F Lofaso1, B Louis, L Brochard, A Harf, D Isabey.   

Abstract

To early detect mucus deposition in endotracheal tubes (ETT), we propose using a geometric, flow-independent parameter, i.e., diameter of the ETT, based on a precise knowledge of ETT flow regime, instead of using the classic flow-dependent ETT resistance based on the empirical, nonlinear Rohrer equation. From the estimated slope of -0.24 derived from Moody diagrams characterizing the pressure-flow relationship in ETT of various inner diameters (D), we first assessed that the Blasius resistance formula slope of -0.25 could be applied to adult-size ETT, meaning that flow remains fully developed, turbulent, and hydraulically smooth (0.5 L/s less than or equal to V less than or equal to 1.4 L/s). Insertion into the ETT of a pressure catheter (external diameter: d) to stimulate in vivo measurements did not modify these results, provided the hydraulic diameter, D* = D - d, was substituted for D in the Blasius formula. The Blasius formula was then used to determine, from in vitro pressure and flow measurements in ETT before intubation and in ETT lined with dry mucus secretions, the effective diameter, shown here to be highly correlated to the actual diameter measured by volumetric water displacement. The effective ETT diameter was measured in eight patients at different stages after oral or nasal intubation. Compared with the actual ETT diameter measured before insertion, the effective diameter was slightly reduced (2.6 +/- 2.5%) during the first week of intubation and was strongly reduced (12.2 +/- 2.8%) during the second week.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1416427     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.4.974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  6 in total

1.  Roles of endotracheal tubes and slip joints in respiratory pressure loss: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Takasugi; Koichi Futagawa; Kouhei Kazuhara; Satoshi Morishita; Takahiko Okuda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Tracheal pressure and endotracheal tube obstruction can be detected by continuous cuff pressure monitoring: in vitro pilot study.

Authors:  Shai Efrati; Israel Deutsch; Gabriel M Gurman; Matitiau Noff; Giorgio Conti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A new device to remove obstruction from endotracheal tubes during mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  G Conti; M Rocco; R A De Blasi; A Lappa; M Antonelli; M Bufi; A Gasparetto
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Physiological predictors of respiratory and cough assistance needs after extubation.

Authors:  Nicolas Terzi; Frédéric Lofaso; Romain Masson; Pascal Beuret; Hervé Normand; Edith Dumanowski; Line Falaize; Bertrand Sauneuf; Cédric Daubin; Jennifer Brunet; Djillali Annane; Jean-Jacques Parienti; David Orlikowski
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.925

5.  Relationship between pre-anesthetic and intra-anesthetic airway resistance in patients undergoing general anesthesia: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Takamitsu Ikeda; Kanji Uchida; Yasuhiro Yamauchi; Takahide Nagase; Koji Oba; Yoshitsugu Yamada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Role of tube size and intranasal compression of the nasotracheal tube in respiratory pressure loss during nasotracheal intubation: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Koichi Futagawa; Yoshihiro Takasugi; Takeharu Kobayashi; Satoshi Morishita; Takahiko Okuda
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.