Literature DB >> 1414942

Effects of dobutamine on Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas and valve resistance in valvular aortic stenosis.

P N Casale1, I F Palacios, V M Abascal, L Harrell, R Davidoff, A E Weyman, M A Fifer.   

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated changes in aortic valve area calculated by the Gorlin equation under conditions of varying transvalvular flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis (AS). To distinguish between flow-dependence of the Gorlin formula and changes in actual orifice area, the Gorlin valve area and 2 other measures of severity of AS, continuity equation valve area and valve resistance, were calculated under 2 flow conditions in 12 patients with AS. Transvalvular flow rate was varied by administration of dobutamine. During dobutamine infusion, right atrial and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures decreased, left ventricular peak systolic pressure and stroke volume increased, and systolic arterial pressure did not change. Heart rate increased by 19%, cardiac output by 38% and mean aortic valve gradient by 25%. The Gorlin valve area increased in all 12 patients by 0.03 to 0.30 cm2. The average Gorlin valve area increased from 0.67 +/- 0.05 to 0.79 +/- 0.06 cm2 (p < 0.001). In contrast, the continuity equation valve area (calculated in a subset of 6 patients) and valve resistance did not change with dobutamine. The data support the conclusion that flow-dependence of the Gorlin aortic valve area, rather than an increase in actual orifice area, is responsible for the finding that greater valve areas are calculated at greater transvalvular flow rates. Valve resistance is a less flow-dependent means of assessing severity of AS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1414942     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90051-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  S Takeda; H Rimington; J Chambers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Update on new technologies in pediatric echocardiography.

Authors:  L I Bezold; M B Lewin; G W Vick; R Pignatelli
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1997

3.  Effects of increasing flow rate on aortic stenotic indices: evidence from percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis.

Authors:  T M Lee; S F Su; M F Chen; C S Liau; Y T Lee
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Impact of valvular resistance on aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement according to the type of prosthesis.

Authors:  Masahiko Asami; Thomas Pilgrim; Stefan Stortecky; Dik Heg; Eva Roost; Stephan Windecker; Lukas Hunziker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Eight-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography evaluation of significant coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Miia Holmström; Mikko A Sillanpää; Markku Kupari; Sari Kivistö; Kirsi Lauerma
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Stephen H Little; Kwan-Leung Chan; Ian G Burwash
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  [Quantification of valvular lesions in patients with left ventricular dysfunction].

Authors:  R R Brandt; M Oppacher; A Elsässer; C W Hamm
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005

8.  Evaluating the severity of aortic stenosis: a re-look at our current 'gold standard' measurements.

Authors:  Yogesh N V Reddy; Rick A Nishimura
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 29.983

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.