Literature DB >> 1410180

The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: a methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences.

J J Allen1, W G Iacono, K D Danielson.   

Abstract

The development and validation of an event-related potential (ERP) memory assessment procedure is detailed. The procedure identifies learned material with high rates of accuracy, whether or not subjects give intentional responses indicating they had previously learned it. Because the traditional analysis of variance approach fails to provide probabilistic conclusions about any given individual, Bayesian posterior probabilities were computed, indicating the probability for each and every person that material was learned. The method was developed on a sample of 20 subjects, and then cross-validated on two additional samples of 20 subjects each. Across the three samples, the method correctly defined over 94% of learned material as learned, and misclassified 4% of the unlearned material. Additionally, in a simple oddball task performed by the same subjects, the method classified rare and frequent material with perfect accuracy. Finally, combining two implicit behavioral measures--mean reaction time and the number of incorrect responses--in Bayesian fashion yielded classification accuracy that actually exceeded that of the ERP-based procedure overall, but the two methods provided identical accuracy in classifying the most critical material as recognized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1410180     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb02024.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  17 in total

1.  Detecting individual memories through the neural decoding of memory states and past experience.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Henry T Greely; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The revealing glance: eye gaze behavior to concealed information.

Authors:  Charlotte Schwedes; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

3.  Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Thomas Bauermann; Peter Stoeter; Gerhard Vossel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Lawrence A Farwell
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Self-reported and P3 event-related potential evaluations of condoms: does what we say match how we feel?

Authors:  Sarah A Lust; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  fMRI-activation patterns in the detection of concealed information rely on memory-related effects.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Olga Klimecki; Thomas Bauermann; Peter Stoeter; Gerhard Vossel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Current research and potential applications of the concealed information test: an overview.

Authors:  Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-12

8.  Time and encoding effects in the concealed knowledge test.

Authors:  Travis L Seymour; Becky R Fraynt
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2009-06-18

9.  Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified.

Authors:  Giorgio Ganis; Haline E Schendan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  "Have You Ever Seen This Face?" - Individual Differences and Event-Related Potentials during Deception.

Authors:  Anja Leue; Sebastian Lange; André Beauducel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.