Literature DB >> 1401382

A meta-analysis of antidepressant outcome under "blinder" conditions.

R P Greenberg1, R F Bornstein, M D Greenberg, S Fisher.   

Abstract

A meta-analysis of 22 studies of antidepressant outcome assessed the level of medication effects under conditions thought to be less subject to clinician bias than those in the typical double-blind drug trial. Studies were included only if, in addition to a newer antidepressant group, they also contained both standard antidepressant and placebo control groups. Effect sizes were quite modest and approximately one half to one quarter the size of those previously reported under more transparent conditions. Effect sizes that were based on clinician outcome ratings were significantly larger than those that were based on patient ratings. Patient ratings revealed no advantage for antidepressants beyond the placebo effect. Effect sizes were unrelated to sample sex ratios, patient age, inpatient or outpatient status, dosage level, and treatment duration. Findings highlight the fragility of the antidepressant effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1401382     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.60.5.664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  17 in total

Review 1.  Antidepressant treatment in children and adolescents: bridging the gap between efficacy and effectiveness.

Authors:  J M Zito; D J Safer
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Looking at effectiveness: ideas from the couch.

Authors:  J Firth-Cozens
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-03

3.  Models of madness: Science and soul.

Authors:  E P Trager
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  1996-06

4.  The use of placebos in psychiatry: a response to the draft document prepared by the Tri-Council Working Group. Canadian College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Authors:  S N Young; L Annable
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Blindness and bias in a trial of antidepressant medication for chronic tension-type headache.

Authors:  K A Holroyd; G Tkachuk; F O'Donnell; G E Cordingley
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.292

6.  Self-report and clinician-rated measures of depression severity: can one replace the other?

Authors:  Rudolf Uher; Roy H Perlis; Anna Placentino; Mojca Zvezdana Dernovšek; Neven Henigsberg; Ole Mors; Wolfgang Maier; Peter McGuffin; Anne Farmer
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.505

7.  Vocal acoustic biomarkers of depression severity and treatment response.

Authors:  James C Mundt; Adam P Vogel; Douglas E Feltner; William R Lenderking
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Correlation between patient and clinician assessments of depression severity in the PREVENT study.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Thomas Li; Susan G Kornstein; Edward S Friedman; Anthony J Rothschild; Ron Pedersen; Philip Ninan; Martin Keller
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 9.  A model of placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 10.  S-adenosyl-methionine in depression: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  George I Papakostas; Jonathan E Alpert; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.