Literature DB >> 1400962

Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and culture for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in naturally infected Peromyscus leucopus and experimentally infected C.B-17 scid/scid mice.

E K Hofmeister1, R B Markham, J E Childs, R R Arthur.   

Abstract

Culture and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were compared for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in wild-caught Peromyscus leucopus and experimentally inoculated C.B-17 scid/scid (severe combined immunodeficient) mice. PCR targeted highly conserved regions of the ospA gene and could detect one to five cultured organisms and 10 to 50 copies of molecularly cloned ospA DNA. Organs (kidney, spleen, and urinary bladder) and/or ear biopsy samples were obtained from 108 captured P. leucopus mice, and tissues were obtained from 7 experimentally inoculated mice. A simple sample-processing procedure with proteinase K and detergent treatment was used in the PCR analysis. Overall, B. burgdorferi was detected in 29 of 108 (27%) P. leucopus mice by culture and in 31 of 108 (29%) mice by PCR. As assessed by the kappa statistic, agreement between PCR and culture was high for ear and bladder (kappa = 0.80 and 0.65, respectively) and low for kidney and spleen (kappa = 0.37 and 0.03, respectively). While concordant results were obtained from 98 animals, PCR detected B. burgdorferi from 6 additional mice for which cultures were negative and culture detected B. burgdorferi from 4 animals which were PCR negative. Further phenol-chloroform extraction of DNA in a limited number of samples improved the sensitivity of PCR compared with that of culture. These results indicate that PCR may be as sensitive as culture for detecting B. burgdorferi in ear samples and that PCR analysis is suitable for establishing the infection status of animals in mark-release-recapture studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1400962      PMCID: PMC270489          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2625-2631.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  31 in total

1.  Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  E M Southern
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1975-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  D C Malloy; R K Nauman; H Paxton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  S L Nielsen; K K Young; A G Barbour
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Comparing the relative potential of rodents as reservoirs of the Lyme disease spirochete (Borrelia burgdorferi).

Authors:  T N Mather; M L Wilson; S I Moore; J M Ribeiro; A Spielman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Experimental Lyme arthritis in rats infected with Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  S W Barthold; K D Moody; G A Terwilliger; P H Duray; R O Jacoby; A C Steere
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Lyme disease-a tick-borne spirochetosis?

Authors:  W Burgdorfer; A G Barbour; S F Hayes; J L Benach; E Grunwaldt; J P Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in white-footed mice and Ixodes dammini at Fort McCoy, Wis.

Authors:  J F Anderson; P H Duray; L A Magnarelli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Molecular detection of persistent Borrelia burgdorferi in the urine of patients with active Lyme disease.

Authors:  J L Goodman; P Jurkovich; J M Kramber; R C Johnson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Molecular analysis of linear plasmid-encoded major surface proteins, OspA and OspB, of the Lyme disease spirochaete Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  S Bergström; V G Bundoc; A G Barbour
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Serologic analyses of Peromyscus leucopus, a rodent reservoir for Borrelia burgdorferi, in northeastern United States.

Authors:  L A Magnarelli; J F Anderson; K E Hyland; D Fish; J B Mcaninch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  15 in total

1.  Two-year evaluation of Borrelia burgdorferi culture and supplemental tests for definitive diagnosis of Lyme disease.

Authors:  Peggy Coulter; Clara Lema; Diane Flayhart; Amy S Linhardt; John N Aucott; Paul G Auwaerter; J Stephen Dumler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Critical evaluation of urine-based PCR assay for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  Carolin Rauter; Markus Mueller; Isabel Diterich; Sabine Zeller; Dieter Hassler; Thomas Meergans; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-08

3.  Comparison of urinary bladder and ear biopsy samples for determining prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in rodents in central Europe.

Authors:  T N Petney; D Hassler; M Brückner; M Maiwald
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Population dynamics of a naturally occurring heterogeneous mixture of Borrelia burgdorferi clones.

Authors:  E K Hofmeister; G E Glass; J E Childs; D H Persing
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus ticks and rodents in a recreational park in south-western Ireland.

Authors:  J S Gray; F Kirstein; J N Robertson; J Stein; O Kahl
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Mammal diversity and infection prevalence in the maintenance of enzootic Borrelia burgdorferi along the western Coastal Plains of Maryland.

Authors:  Jennifer M Anderson; Katherine I Swanson; Timothy R Schwartz; Gregory E Glass; Douglas E Norris
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.133

Review 7.  PCR in laboratory diagnosis of human Borrelia burgdorferi infections.

Authors:  B L Schmidt
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Diagnostic value of PCR for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in clinical specimens from patients with erythema migrans and Lyme neuroborreliosis.

Authors:  A M Lebech; K Hansen; F Brandrup; O Clemmensen; L Halkier-Sørensen
Journal:  Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-06

9.  PCR-like cascade reactions in the context of an allosteric enzyme mimic.

Authors:  Hyo Jae Yoon; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Natural infections with Borrelia spirochetes in two dogs from Florida.

Authors:  E B Breitschwerdt; W L Nicholson; A R Kiehl; C Steers; D J Meuten; J F Levine
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.