Literature DB >> 1400949

New vancomycin disk diffusion breakpoints for enterococci. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Working Group on Enterococci.

J M Swenson1, M J Ferraro, D F Sahm, P Charache, F C Tenover.   

Abstract

Since 1988, when the first vancomycin-resistant enterococcus was described, several descriptions of failures of disk diffusion breakpoints to detect low-level vancomycin resistance (MICs, 8 to 32 micrograms/ml) have been published. A four-laboratory collaborative study was undertaken to establish more accurate breakpoints for the disk test. Mueller-Hinton agar was used to perform dilution testing (in three laboratories) and disk diffusion testing (in all laboratories). Results were determined at 18, 24, and 48 h, and zones of inhibition were read using both transmitted and reflected light. One hundred organisms (35 Enterococcus faecalis, 55 E. faecium, and 10 E. gallinarum or E. casseliflavus isolates) were selected to represent vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant phenotypes. Interlaboratory agreement of agar dilution MICs was better at 24 h (91 to 94% within +/- 1 dilution) than at 18 h (76% within +/- 1 dilution). Therefore, 24-h agar dilution MIC results were used as the reference. For disk diffusion, it was critical to note the presence of a haze or colonies inside the zone when interpreting the test, since this correlated better with the results of the agar dilution test. The presence of a haze or inner colonies was best detected by reading the zones with transmitted light and incubating the plates for a full 24 h. When plotted against 24-h agar dilution MICs, breakpoints of </= 14 mm (resistant), 15 to 16 mm (intermediate), and >/= 17 mm (susceptible) resulted in 58 minor errors (14.5% of total values) and 5 very major errors (2.2% of resistant values or 1.3% of total values). No major errors were seen. Results of repeat testing using a common lot of Mueller-Hinton agar showed 52 minor errors (13.3%) and 4 major errors (4.2% of susceptible values of 1.0% pf total values) but no very major errors. It is recommended that any haze or colonies within the zone be taken into account when determining zones of inhibition and that an MIC test be performed for strains with intermediate zones if vancomycin is being considered for treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1400949      PMCID: PMC270472          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2525-2528.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

Review 1.  Resistance of enterococci to glycopeptides.

Authors:  P Courvalin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Inducible, transferable resistance to vancomycin in Enterococcus faecium, D399.

Authors:  D M Shlaes; S Al-Obeid; J H Shlaes; A Boisivon; R Williamson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Problems with the disk diffusion test for detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci.

Authors:  J M Swenson; B C Hill; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Plasmid-mediated resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  R Leclercq; E Derlot; J Duval; P Courvalin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Isolation of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in haematologic patients.

Authors:  H F Guiot; W E Peetermans; F W Sebens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  High-level vancomycin-resistant enterococci causing hospital infections.

Authors:  A H Uttley; R C George; J Naidoo; N Woodford; A P Johnson; C H Collins; D Morrison; A J Gilfillan; L E Fitch; J Heptonstall
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.451

7.  Vancomycin-resistant Streptococcaceae from clinical material.

Authors:  R Lütticken; G Kunstmann
Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A       Date:  1988-01

8.  Vancomycin susceptibility and identification of motile enterococci.

Authors:  S Vincent; R G Knight; M Green; D F Sahm; D M Shlaes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Inducible, transferable resistance to vancomycin in Enterococcus faecalis A256.

Authors:  D M Shlaes; A Bouvet; C Devine; J H Shlaes; S al-Obeid; R Williamson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Recovery of resistant enterococci during vancomycin prophylaxis.

Authors:  A H Kaplan; P H Gilligan; R R Facklam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  Y Cetinkaya; P Falk; C G Mayhall
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Factors influencing the vitek gram-positive susceptibility system's detection of vanB-encoded vancomycin resistance among enterococci.

Authors:  B Jett; L Free; D F Sahm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of commercial vancomycin agar screen plates for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  K G Van Horn; C A Gedris; K M Rodney; J B Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance.

Authors:  N Woodford; A P Johnson; D Morrison; D C Speller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Comparison of eight methods to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci.

Authors:  H P Endtz; N Van Den Braak; A Van Belkum; W H Goessens; D Kreft; A B Stroebel; H A Verbrugh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Efficacy of vancomycin and teicoplanin alone and in combination with streptomycin in experimental, low-level vancomycin-resistant, VanB-type Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis.

Authors:  D P Nicolau; M N Marangos; C H Nightingale; K B Patel; B W Cooper; R Quintiliani; P Courvalin; R Quintiliani
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Reliability of the E test for detection of ampicillin, vancomycin, and high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus spp.

Authors:  J E Schulz; D F Sahm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Proficiency of clinical laboratories in and near Monterrey, Mexico, to detect vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  L C McDonald; L R Garza; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Outbreak of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium with transferable vanB class vancomycin resistance.

Authors:  J M Boyce; S M Opal; J W Chow; M J Zervos; G Potter-Bynoe; C B Sherman; R L Romulo; S Fortna; A A Medeiros
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  F C Tenover; J Tokars; J Swenson; S Paul; K Spitalny; W Jarvis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.