Literature DB >> 1398363

Range of motion of the foot as a function of age.

B M Nigg1, V Fisher, T L Allinger, J R Ronsky, J R Engsberg.   

Abstract

Movement of the foot is essential for human locomotion. The purpose of this paper was to quantify the range of motion of the foot as a function of age and to compare the rage of motion measurements for the foot in a laboratory coordinate system and a coordinate system fixed to the tibia. The measurements were taken in vivo using a range of motion instrument developed by Allinger (University of Calgary, Canada, 1990) from 121 subjects. The results suggest that: (1) the range of motion in general is greater for women than for men in the young adult group; (2) the range of motion in general is in the same order of magnitude for women and men in the oldest age group; and (3) the range of motion is about 8 degrees smaller in dorsiflexion and about 8 degrees higher in plantarflexion for women than for men in the oldest age group. It is speculated that physical activity and common shoe wear are factors influencing the age- and gender-dependent differences in range of motion. Furthermore, it has been shown that the range of motion values measured in a laboratory coordinate system and in a coordinate system fixed in the tibia are different in all directions except inversion. The differences in plantarflexion and dorsiflexion and inversion and eversion are relatively small. However, they are substantial for adduction and abduction. In all cases, the results were bigger for measurements in the laboratory coordinate system compared with the tibia coordinate system, because the movement of the lower leg was included in the measurements in the laboratory coordinate system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1398363     DOI: 10.1177/107110079201300608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle        ISSN: 0198-0211


  7 in total

1.  Risk assessment after hip fracture: check the "healthy" leg!

Authors:  K Pils; W Meisner; W Haas; G Ebenbichler; F Herrmann
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Foot Type Biomechanics Part 2: are structure and anthropometrics related to function?

Authors:  Rajshree Mootanah; Jinsup Song; Mark W Lenhoff; Jocelyn F Hafer; Sherry I Backus; David Gagnon; Jonathan T Deland; Howard J Hillstrom
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Multisegment foot kinematics during walking in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Dominique Legault-Moore; Victoria L Chester; Gwyneth de Vries
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2012-07-20

4.  The Glasgow-Maastricht foot model, evaluation of a 26 segment kinematic model of the foot.

Authors:  Michiel Oosterwaal; Sylvain Carbes; Scott Telfer; James Woodburn; Søren Tørholm; Amir A Al-Munajjed; Lodewijk van Rhijn; Kenneth Meijer
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Effects of 14 days of bed rest and following physical training on metabolic cost, mechanical work, and efficiency during walking in older and young healthy males.

Authors:  Mirco Floreani; Enrico Rejc; Paolo Taboga; Alessandro Ganzini; Rado Pišot; Bostjan Šimunič; Gianni Biolo; Carlo Reggiani; Angelina Passaro; Marco Narici; Joern Rittweger; Pietro Enrico di Prampero; Stefano Lazzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of reduction of edema after rest and after muscle exercises in treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.

Authors:  Belczak Cleusa Ema Quilici; Cavalheri Gildo; Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy; Belczak Sergio Quilici; Caffaro Roberto Augusto
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2009-07-14

7.  Angle-torque relationship of the subtalar pronators and supinators in younger and elderly males and females.

Authors:  Marco Hagen; Daniel Sanchez-Bergmann; Sebastian Seidel; Matthias Lahner
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.303

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.