Literature DB >> 1397221

Possible confounders of the relationship between occupational swine contact and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:3 and 0:9 antibodies.

M Seuri1, K Granfors.   

Abstract

Increased risk of high Yersinia enterocolitica 0:3 and 0:9 antibody content has been previously reported in occupations with swine contact. In this study several possible confounders of this elevated risk among pig farmers and abattoir workers were considered. Only in three instances the standardized risk ratio was decreased close to unity, namely after the standardization of Y. enterocolitica 0:3 IgG antibody positivity for age among abattoir workers, after the standardization of Y. enterocolitica 0:9 IgG antibody positivity for farm butchering among pig farmers and for smoking among abattoir workers. As the decrease did not apply for both pig farmers and abattoir workers and for both 0:3 and 0:9 serotypes considered, it seems reasonable to assume that the three decreases represent products of multiple testing inherent in this kind of search of confounders rather than any true effects. In view of the present knowledge on the determinants of yersinia antibodies in populations, the crude risk ratios for elevated yersinia antibodies can be held to be reasonably unconfounded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1397221     DOI: 10.1007/bf00146372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  16 in total

Review 1.  Yersinia enterocolitica.

Authors:  T L Cover; R C Aber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 antibodies in slaughterhouse employees, veterinarians, and military recruits. Occupational exposure to pigs as a risk factor for yersiniosis.

Authors:  T Nesbakken; G Kapperud; J Lassen; E Skjerve
Journal:  Contrib Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1991

3.  Comparison of bacteria with and without plasmid-encoded proteins as antigens for measurement of immunoglobulin M, G, and A antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  K Granfors; R Lahesmaa-Rantala; T H Ståhlberg; A Toivanen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  The prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica 0:3 in Finnish pigs and pork.

Authors:  K Asplund; V Tuovinen; P Veijalainen; J Hirn
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  [Agricultural animals as a source of yersiniosis].

Authors:  E N Kolos; I N Gnutov; G V Iushchenko; V I Dunaev
Journal:  Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol       Date:  1985-04

6.  Isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica from pigs in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  D Hunter; S Hughes; E Fox
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1983-04-02       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Antibodies against Yersinia among farmers and slaughterhouse workers.

Authors:  M Seuri; K Granfors
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Carriage of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 3 by pigs as a source of human infection.

Authors:  G Wauters
Journal:  Contrib Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1979

9.  Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia enterocolitica-like bacteria in drinking water and sewage sludge.

Authors:  G Langeland
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B       Date:  1983-06

10.  Yersinia enterocolitica infections and pork: the missing link.

Authors:  R V Tauxe; J Vandepitte; G Wauters; S M Martin; V Goossens; P De Mol; R Van Noyen; G Thiers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.