Literature DB >> 1394799

Influence of the cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in the dog.

J R Baldwin1, B A Phillips, S K Overmyer, N Z Hatfield, P K Narang.   

Abstract

The influence of dexrazoxane on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics was investigated in four dogs using the two treatment sequences of saline/doxorubicin or dexrazoxane/doxorubicin. Intravenous doses of 1.5 mg/kg doxorubicin and 30 mg/kg (the 20-fold multiple) dexrazoxane were given separately, with doxorubicin being injected within 1 min of the dexrazoxane dose. Both doxorubicin and its 13-dihydro metabolite doxorubicinol were quantified in plasma and urine using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) fluorescence assay. The doxorubicin plasma concentration versus time data were adequately fit by a three-compartment model. The mean half-lives calculated for the fast and slow distributive and terminal elimination phases in the saline/doxorubicin group were 3.0 +/- 0.5 and 32.2 +/- 12.8 min and 30.0 +/- 4.0 h, respectively. The model-predicted plasma concentrations were virtually identical for the saline and dexrazoxane treatment groups. Analysis of variance of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCo-infinity), terminal elimination rate (lambda z), systemic clearance (CLs), and renal clearance (CLr) for the parent drug showed no statistically significant difference (P greater than 0.05) between the two treatments. Furthermore, the doxorubicinol plasma AUCo-t value and the doxorubicinol-to-doxorubicin AUCo-t ratio showed no significant difference, demonstrating that dexrazoxane had no effect on the metabolic capacity for formation of the 13-dihydro metabolite. The total urinary excretion measured as parent drug plus doxorubicinol and the metabolite-to-parent ratio in urine were also unaffected by the presence of dexrazoxane. The myelosuppressive effects of doxorubicin as determined by WBC monitoring revealed no apparent difference between the two treatments. In conclusion, these results show that drug exposure was similar for the two treatment arms. No kinetic interaction with dexrazoxane suggests that its coadministration is unlikely to modify the safety and/or efficacy of doxorubicin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1394799     DOI: 10.1007/bf00685593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  21 in total

1.  Doxorubicin and doxorubicinol: intra- and inter-individual variations of pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  J M Jacquet; F Bressolle; M Galtier; M Bourrier; D Donadio; J Jourdan; J F Rossi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Microsomal reductive glycosidase.

Authors:  N R Bachur; M Gee
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Risk factors for doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure.

Authors:  D D Von Hoff; M W Layard; P Basa; H L Davis; A L Von Hoff; M Rozencweig; F M Muggia
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Enhancement of rat heart microsomal lipid peroxidation following doxorubicin treatment in vivo.

Authors:  E G Mimnaugh; M A Trush; T E Gram
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug

5.  Plasma pharmacokinetics of adriamycin and adriamycinol: implications for the design of in vitro experiments and treatment protocols.

Authors:  R F Greene; J M Collins; J F Jenkins; J L Speyer; C E Myers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Epirubicin and doxorubicin comparative metabolism and pharmacokinetics. A cross-over study.

Authors:  C M Camaggi; R Comparsi; E Strocchi; F Testoni; B Angelelli; F Pannuti
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Effect of pretreatment with ICRF-187 on the total cumulative dose of doxorubicin tolerated by beagle dogs.

Authors:  E H Herman; V J Ferrans; R S Young; R L Hamlin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  The hydrolysis activation of the doxorubicin cardioprotective agent ICRF-187 [+)-1,2-bis(3,5-dioxopiperazinyl-1-yl)propane).

Authors:  B B Hasinoff
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.922

9.  Anthracycline antibiotic-stimulated superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical production by NADH dehydrogenase.

Authors:  J H Doroshow
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Metal binding by pharmaceuticals. Part 2. Interactions of Ca(II), Cu(II), Fe(II), Mg(II), Mn(II) and Zn(II) with the intracellular hydrolysis products of the antitumour agent ICRF 159 and its inactive homologue ICRF 192.

Authors:  Z X Huang; P M May; K M Quinlan; D R Williams; A M Creighton
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1982-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Timing of treatment with ICRF-187 and its effect on chronic doxorubicin cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  E H Herman; V J Ferrans
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Predictive value of ex vivo biodynamic imaging in determining response to chemotherapy in dogs with spontaneous non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: a preliminary study.

Authors:  D D Nolte; M O Childress; M R Custead; R An; J J Turek; G E Moore
Journal:  Converg Sci Phys Oncol       Date:  2015-10-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.