Literature DB >> 1394266

Predicting the recurrence of ependymomas from the bromodeoxyuridine labeling index.

A Asai1, T Hoshino, M S Edwards, R L Davis.   

Abstract

The usefulness of histopathological grading in predicting the prognosis of patients with ependymomas is controversial. To clarify the discrepancy between the histological malignancy and the prognosis of these tumors, we estimated the proliferative potential of 32 intracranial and intraspinal ependymomas and correlated the findings with the clinical behavior. Each patient received an intraoperative infusion of bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR, 200 mg/m2 i.v.) before tumor removal; the BUdR labeling index (LI), or percentage of BUdR-labeled cells, was determined immunohistochemically in excised specimens. The mean BUdR LI (+/- SD) of intracranial malignant ependymomas was 4.1 +/- 2.8%. Nonmalignant intracranial and intraspinal ependymomas and subependymomas had mean LIs of 1.5 +/- 0.9%, 1.1 +/- 0.3%, and less than 1%, respectively. Overall, 44% of the tumors recurred. There were no statistically significant differences in the recurrence rates of intracranial and intraspinal ependymomas, including subependymomas (43% and 44%, respectively), or of intracranial ependymomas with LIs greater than 1.0% and less than 1.0% (67% and 44%, respectively). However, the early recurrence rate (within 24 months after treatment) of tumors with LIs greater than 1.0% was higher than that of tumors with LIs of less than 1.0% (100% vs. 25%, P less than 0.05). The BUdR LI also showed a statistically significant inverse correlation with the time to recurrence. These findings indicate that BUdR LI reflects the proliferative potential of individual ependymomas and can be used to help predict the recurrence and estimate the prognosis of these tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1394266     DOI: 10.1007/bf00300795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  26 in total

1.  INTRACRANIAL EPENDYMOMAS: FACTORS INFLUENCING PROGNOSIS.

Authors:  I I KRICHEFF; M BECKER; S A SCHNECK; J M TAVERAS
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Ependymoma: a follow-up study of 101 cases.

Authors:  S J Mork; A C Loken
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Lack of histopathological correlation of malignant ependymomas with postoperative survival.

Authors:  G W Ross; L J Rubinstein
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Ependymomas and ependymoblastomas in children.

Authors:  G J Dohrmann; J R Farwell; J T Flannery
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Ependymomas: results of radiation treatment.

Authors:  P G Garrett; W J Simpson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Ependymoma: internal correlations among pathological signs: the anaplastic variant.

Authors:  D Schiffer; A Chiò; H Cravioto; M T Giordana; A Migheli; R Soffietti; M C Vigliani
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Management of intramedullary spinal cord tumors.

Authors:  G Kopelson; R M Linggood; G M Kleinman; J Doucette; C C Wang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Computed tomography in the follow-up of medulloblastomas and ependymomas.

Authors:  D R Enzmann; D Norman; V Levin; C Wilson; T H Newton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Supratentorial lobar ependymomas: reports on the grading and survival periods in 80 cases, including 46 recurrences.

Authors:  D Afra; W Müller; F Slowik; O Wilcke; H Budka; L Turoczy
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  The biology of childhood ependymomas.

Authors:  R M Shuman; E C Alvord; R W Leech
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1975-11
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Immunohistochemical prognostic markers in intracranial ependymomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Klara Kuncova; Ales Janda; Pavel Kasal; Josef Zamecnik
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Ki-67 labeling is correlated with the time to recurrence in primary glioblastomas.

Authors:  Roland Schröder; Klaus D Feisel; Ralf-Ingo Ernestus
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  A clinicopathologic study of 81 patients with ependymomas and proposal of diagnostic criteria for anaplastic ependymoma.

Authors:  D M Ho; C Y Hsu; T T Wong; H Chiang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  A case of recurrent subependymoma with subependymal seeding: case report.

Authors:  Ho Jun Seol; Sung-Kyun Hwang; Yoon La Choi; Je G Chi; Hee-Won Jung
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Outcomes of malignant CNS ependymomas: an examination of 2408 cases through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2005).

Authors:  Dayron Rodríguez; Michael C Cheung; Nadine Housri; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Kevin Camphausen; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Ependymomas: MIB-1 proliferation index and survival.

Authors:  A M Ritter; K R Hess; R E McLendon; L A Langford
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Immunohistochemical markers for prognosis of ependymal neoplasms.

Authors:  Andrey Korshunov; Andrey Golanov; Valery Timirgaz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.130

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.