Literature DB >> 1393418

An investigation into the effect of protective devices on the dose to radiosensitive organs in the head and neck.

N W Marshall1, K Faulkner, P Clarke.   

Abstract

A series of experiments were performed to determine the dose reduction afforded to radiosensitive organs in the head and neck by various protective devices. These included spectacles with plastic, standard glass, photochromic and lead-glass lenses, a thyroid collar and a lead-acrylic face mask. The measurements were performed using an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosemeters, in conditions realistic of clinical practice. Irradiations were performed using scattered radiation produced by a pelvic phantom, for X-ray beams generated at 80 kVp and 110 KVp. It was found that the reduction in dose to the lens of the eye ranged between 0% and 97%, whilst the dose to the thyroid and oesophagus was reduced by between 76% and 97%, and was dependent on the protective device and tube potential employed. A reduction in brain dose of up to 81% was also measured, for the lead-acrylic face mask. Also presented is the ratio of organ dose to dose to the bridge of the nose for thyroid, oesophagus, brain and sinuses, as measured for the case of no head or neck protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1393418     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-777-799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  8 in total

Review 1.  Personal dosimetry for interventional operators: when and how should monitoring be done?

Authors:  C J Martin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Minimising radiation exposure to physicians performing fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterisation procedures: a review.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Comparison of fluoroscopic operator eye exposures when working from femoral region, side, or head of patient.

Authors:  M Jordan Ray; Fawzi Mohammad; William B Taylor; Marco Cura; Clare Savage
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-07

4.  Shielding effect of thyroid collar for digital panoramic radiography.

Authors:  G-S Han; J-G Cheng; G Li; X-C Ma
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Eliseo Vañó; Gabriel Bartal; Stephen Balter; Robert Dixon; Renato Padovani; Beth Schueler; John F Cardella; Thierry de Baère
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Predictors of Excess Patient Radiation Exposure During Chronic Total Occlusion Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Contemporary Multicentre Registry.

Authors:  Georgios E Christakopoulos; Georgios Christopoulos; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Khaldoon Alaswad; Robert W Yeh; Farouc A Jaffer; Michael R Wyman; William L Lombardi; Muhammad Nauman J Tarar; J Aaron Grantham; David E Kandzari; Nicholas Lembo; Jeffrey W Moses; Ajay J Kirtane; Manish Parikh; Philip Green; Matthew Finn; Santiago Garcia; Anthony H Doing; Raja Hatem; Craig A Thompson; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 7.  Radiation protection for the interventional cardiologist: Practical approach and innovations.

Authors:  Alejandro Gutierrez-Barrios; Dolores Cañadas-Pruaño; Inmaculada Noval-Morillas; Livia Gheorghe; Ricardo Zayas-Rueda; German Calle-Perez
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-26

Review 8.  Radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Sylvia Marie R Biso; Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.005

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.