Literature DB >> 1391979

Epidermal growth factor receptor in breast cancer: storage conditions affecting measurement, and relationship to steroid receptors.

W R McLeay1, D J Horsfall, R Seshadri, D A Morrison, G T Saccone.   

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of freezing and storage of tissue and subcellular fractions on the measurement of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGF-r); compares competition binding and single saturating dose assays (SSD) for quantitating EGF-r levels; investigates several tissues as potential quality control; and examines the relationship between EGF-r and hormone receptor expression in human breast cancers. Mouse and calf uterine cell membranes were preferred sources of quality control tissue with similar levels of high affinity EGF-r to human breast cancer tissue (less than 150-200 fmol/mg membrane protein). Studies using pooled mouse uterine tissues indicated a loss of 40% in EGF-r activity following a single-20 degrees C freeze/thaw cycle, while a breast cancer tissue showed a 75% loss, independent of storage temperature (liquid nitrogen, -70 degrees C, -20 degrees C). A single freeze/thaw cycle of mouse uterine broken cell pellets (nuclei plus membrane fraction) again indicated a loss of EGF-r irrespective of storage temperature (43% loss at -70 degrees C, 52% loss at -20 degrees C). In most cases irrespective of the tissue type or tissue fraction being stored, the length of storage had little impact on the extent of the loss in activity. A second freeze/thaw cycle of intact tissue, or freezing of broken cell pellets from a previously-frozen tissue, led to a further major or total loss of the remaining EGF-r. Overall these results are commensurate with the published effects of freezing and storage on estrogen receptor measurement. In addition, our studies suggest that the most suitable procedure for assaying frozen breast cancer specimens for EGF-r levels in conjunction with steroid receptor quantitation is to prepare and assay both cytosol and membrane fractions for their respective receptor content without further storage. A concordance of 86% was found in 44 breast cancers assayed for EGF-4 by saturation analysis and SSD. Statistically significant inverse relationships were found between EGF-r and estrogen and progesterone receptor levels in the study of approximately 350 breast cancer patients. No association was found with tumor stage or diameter, axillary node involvement, or patient age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1391979     DOI: 10.1007/bf01833344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  22 in total

1.  Epidermal growth factor receptor assay: validation of a single point method and application to breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Formento; M Francoual; P Formento; M C Etienne; J L Fischel; M Namer; M Frenay; E François; G Milano
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Variants of 3T3 cells lacking mitogenic response to epidermal growth factor.

Authors:  R M Pruss; H R Herschman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The effect of storage time and molybdate on steroid receptors in gynaecological tissues.

Authors:  M Toppila; D Willcocks; J P Tyler; C J Eastman; C N Hudson
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.668

4.  Epidermal growth factor receptors and prognosis in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  F Spyratos; J C Delarue; C Andrieu; R Lidereau; M H Champème; K Hacène; M Brunet
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Prognostic value of receptors for insulin-like growth factor 1, somatostatin, and epidermal growth factor in human breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Foekens; H Portengen; W L van Putten; A M Trapman; J C Reubi; J Alexieva-Figusch; J G Klijn
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Epidermal growth factor binding by breast tumor biopsies and relationship to estrogen receptor and progestin receptor levels.

Authors:  S L Fitzpatrick; J Brightwell; J L Wittliff; G H Barrows; G S Schultz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Epidermal growth factor receptor in human breast cancers: correlation with estrogen and progesterone receptors.

Authors:  J C Delarue; S Friedman; H Mouriesse; F May-Levin; H Sancho-Garnier; G Contesso
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Quantitative assays of epidermal growth factor receptor in human breast cancer: cut-off points of clinical relevance.

Authors:  S Nicholson; J R Sainsbury; G K Needham; P Chambers; J R Farndon; A L Harris
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Relationship between ploidy and steroid hormone receptors in primary invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  D J Horsfall; W D Tilley; S R Orell; V R Marshall; E L Cant
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) status associated with failure of primary endocrine therapy in elderly postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  S Nicholson; P Halcrow; J R Sainsbury; B Angus; P Chambers; J R Farndon; A L Harris
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The procurement, storage, and quality assurance of frozen blood and tissue biospecimens in pathology, biorepository, and biobank settings.

Authors:  Maryam Shabihkhani; Gregory M Lucey; Bowen Wei; Sergey Mareninov; Jerry J Lou; Harry V Vinters; Elyse J Singer; Timothy F Cloughesy; William H Yong
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.281

2.  Clinical value of enzyme immunoassay of epidermal growth factor receptor in human breast cancer.

Authors:  H Iwase; S Kobayashi; Y Itoh; T Kuzushima; H Yamashita; H Iwata; A Naito; T Yamashita; K Itoh; A Masaoka
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Development and validation of protein biomarkers of health in grizzly bears.

Authors:  Abbey E Wilson; Sarah A Michaud; Angela M Jackson; Gordon Stenhouse; Nicholas C Coops; David M Janz
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.079

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.