Literature DB >> 1391755

Auditory attention and selective input modulation: a topographical ERP study.

R Näätänen1, W Teder, K Alho, J Lavikainen.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in subjects receiving tones (left ear 300 Hz, right ear 6000 Hz) at a rapid rate and trying to detect occasional higher-pitched stimuli in a designated ear. ERPs to attended stimuli showed enhanced negative amplitudes whose topographical distribution differed from that of the exogeneous N1 component. Moreover, the latter was considerably larger for low than high tones, whereas the attention effect had similar amplitudes for the two tones. Consequently, the attention effect, even when perfectly coinciding in time with N1, does not seem to be caused by modulation of the exogeneous N1 but rather by a separate process activated by attention. This suggests that attention does not modulate initial stimulus representations in audition.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1391755     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199206000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  38 in total

1.  The hemodynamics of oddball processing during single-tone and two-tone target detection tasks.

Authors:  Michael C Stevens; Kristin R Laurens; Peter F Liddle; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Attending points in time and space.

Authors:  Kathrin Lange; Ulrike M Krämer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bi-directional modulation of somatosensory mismatch negativity with transcranial direct current stimulation: an event related potential study.

Authors:  Jui-Cheng Chen; Dorothea Hämmerer; Kevin D'Ostilio; Elias P Casula; Louise Marshall; Chon-Haw Tsai; John C Rothwell; Mark J Edwards
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Converging evidence for [coronal] underspecification in English-speaking adults.

Authors:  Alycia Cummings; John Madden; Kathryn Hefta
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: event-related potential evidence.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Lori B Astheimer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

6.  Functional features of crossmodal mismatch responses.

Authors:  Chen Zhao; Elia Valentini; Li Hu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Using biomarkers to inform diagnosis, guide treatments and track response to interventions in psychotic illnesses.

Authors:  Veronica B Perez; Neal R Swerdlow; David L Braff; Risto Näätänen; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.851

8.  Musical Meter Modulates the Allocation of Attention across Time.

Authors:  Ahren B Fitzroy; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Mismatch task conditions and error related ERPs.

Authors:  Irene S Karanasiou; Charalabos Papageorgiou; Eleni I Tsianaka; Miltiades Kyprianou; George K Matsopoulos; Errikos M Ventouras; Nikolaos K Uzunoglu
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  ERP characterization of sustained attention effects in visual lexical categorization.

Authors:  Clara D Martin; Guillaume Thierry; Jean-François Démonet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.