Literature DB >> 1389781

Range of motion after total condylar knee arthroplasty.

W Menke1, B Schmitz, S Salm.   

Abstract

In this study the function of the knee measured at a medium-follow-up of 5-6 years was correlated with influencing factors concerning the implant of total condylar knee prosthesis in 90 patients. The only variable affecting postoperative extension was the preoperative range of extension whereas postoperative flexion was influenced by the preoperative flexion, valgus deviation of the preoperative AP tibial-femoral angle, position of the patella, and thickness of the resection of the distal femur cut.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1389781     DOI: 10.1007/bf00571524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  10 in total

1.  The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  H E Figgie; V M Goldberg; K G Heiple; H S Moller; N H Gordon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living.

Authors:  K N Laubenthal; G L Smidt; D B Kettelkamp
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1972-01

3.  The total condylar knee prosthesis: the first 5 years.

Authors:  J Insall; A J Tria; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement.

Authors:  P A Lotke; M L Ecker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Range of motion following total knee arthroplasty in ankylosed joints.

Authors:  J O Mullen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Results of total knee arthroplasty with a non-constrained prosthesis.

Authors:  J M Cloutier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. A five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements.

Authors:  J N Insall; R W Hood; L B Flawn; D J Sullivan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience.

Authors:  J N Insall; P F Lachiewicz; A H Burstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Predictive range of motion after total knee replacement.

Authors:  M A Ritter; E A Stringer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Total condylar knee replacement. A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Schurman; J N Parker; D Ornstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.284

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Factors influencing range of motion after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Farahini; M Moghtadaei; A Bagheri; E Akbarian
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 0.611

2.  Variables Determining the Postoperative Knee Range of Motion Following Cruciate-substituting Total Knee Replacement: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Nabin K Sahu; Smarajit Patnaik; Saurav Nanda; Mantu Jain
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-08-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.