Literature DB >> 1388806

Results of photorefractometric screening for amblyogenic defects in children aged 20 months.

M R Angi1, V Pucci, F Forattini, P A Formentin.   

Abstract

This report evaluates the validity of a preventive programme in a population which underwent refractometric screening at the ages of 20 months and 4 years. In 1987, 1,046 children born in 1985 in the territory of the Veneto National Health Unit No. 19 were invited to undergo screening for amblyogenic factors such as meridional hyperopia greater than or equal to +2.50 diopters (D), myopia less than or equal to -2.50 D, anisometropia greater than or equal to 2 D, opacity of the dioptric media and strabismus. The test method was non-cycloplegic photorefractometry (PhR). Seven hundred and ninety-five children were tested (76%); positive cases underwent subsequent cycloplegic autorefractometry (AR) and corrective lenses were prescribed as necessary. In 1989, an eye test was performed on 653 children who had taken part in the previous PhR screening and on 350 similar children who had not: the test included evaluation of visual acuity, stereopsis and AR. An eye with a corrected visual acuity of less than 0.7 was considered amblyopic. PhR demonstrated a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 96% and a positive prediction rating of 46% in the identification of amblyogenic factors. The prevalence of amblyopia at 4 years of age in the group which had undergone previous screening was 1.07% vs. 2.57% in the group which had not (P: not significant). The progress of the myopia was studied in a group with full optical correction used continuously (Group A) and in a control group under-corrected by at least 1.5 D (Group B).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1388806     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80198-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  The relationship between anisometropia, patient age, and the development of amblyopia.

Authors:  Sean P Donahue
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

2.  Is community screening for amblyopia possible, or appropriate?

Authors:  M C Wright; D J Colville; F Oberklaid
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Heritability of myopic refractive errors in identical and fraternal twins.

Authors:  M R Angi; M Clementi; C Sardei; E Piattelli; C Bisantis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Personality, psychophysical stress and myopia progression. A prospective study on 57 university students.

Authors:  M Angi; G Rupolo; C de Bertolini; C Bisantis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Screening for abnormal levels of hyperopia in children: a non-cycloplegic method with a hand held refractor.

Authors:  M Cordonnier; M Dramaix
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Video vision development assessment (VVDA): combining the Brückner test with eccentric photorefraction for dynamic identification of amblyogenic factors in infants and children.

Authors:  G W Cibis
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1994

7.  Multifaceted Amblyopia Screening with blinq, 2WIN, and PDI Check.

Authors:  Robert Arnold; Mario Angi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.