Literature DB >> 1381788

The effects of antihypertensive medications on the physiological response to maximal exercise testing.

W E Derman1, R Sims, T D Noakes.   

Abstract

This study compared the effects of clinically prescribed doses of cilazapril, nifedipine, and atenolol on maximal exercise performance in physically active subjects. In a double-blind crossover trial, 10 healthy male volunteers performed progressive aerobic exercise to exhaustion for determination of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max), after single dose ingestion of cilazapril, nifedipine, atenolol, and placebo. Measurements were made at exhaustion and at a single submaximal workload (250 W). Exercise time to exhaustion and peak workload were decreased by all agents (p less than 0.05 vs. placebo), but VO2 max was decreased by atenolol only (p less than 0.05 vs. placebo). Although both atenolol and cilazapril decreased the maximum systolic blood pressure, the peak heart rate was decreased only by atenolol (p less than 0.001 vs. placebo). Whereas submaximal oxygen consumption, minute ventilation, and blood lactate concentrations were not different between groups, ratings of perceived exertion were increased during submaximal exercise by atenolol and cilazapril (p less than 0.05 vs. placebo). Cilazapril, nifedipine, and atenolol all impaired exercise performance and increased ratings of perceived exertion during submaximal exercise without altering rates of oxygen consumption or blood lactate accumulation. Maximal exercise performance was impaired to a greater extent by atenolol than by nifedipine or cilazapril. This study suggests that either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium-channel antagonists might be preferable for the management of hypertension in athletic patients as they have a lesser effect on exercise performance, at least in healthy individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1381788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  6 in total

Review 1.  Peptide synthesis through evolution.

Authors:  K Tamura; R W Alexander
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  [Complications during exercise testing].

Authors:  R Berent; J Auer; S P von Duvillard; H Sinzinger; P Schmid
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  The use of ratings of perceived exertion for exercise prescription in patients receiving beta-blocker therapy.

Authors:  R Eston; D Connolly
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Use of ratings of perceived exertion for predicting maximal work rate and prescribing exercise intensity in patients taking atenolol.

Authors:  R G Eston; M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Return to activity at altitude after high-altitude illness.

Authors:  Kevin Deweber; Keith Scorza
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 6.  Exercise and sport science australia position stand update on exercise and hypertension.

Authors:  James E Sharman; Neil A Smart; Jeff S Coombes; Michael Stowasser
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.012

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.