Literature DB >> 1381070

Follow-up results from a randomised controlled trial evaluating in- and outpatient pain management programmes.

Janet Peters1, Robert G Large, Gail Elkind.   

Abstract

This study reports a 9-18 month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial of pain management programmes for chronic, non-malignant pain. Twenty-two inpatients, 18 outpatients and 12 control subjects completed the follow-up assessments. Significant treatment effects were demonstrated by the inpatient group on pain ratings, the Pain Behaviour Checklist, and General Health Questionnaire, with similar effects demonstrated by the outpatient group on the former 2 measures. The findings were confounded by higher inpatient scores at pretreatment, in comparison with the 2 other conditions. There was a high drop-out rate of subjects, particularly from the control condition which illustrates the limitations of controlled group designs in this area. Analgesic use, activity levels and pain ratings were also evaluated using the criteria for 'success' described by Malec et al. (1981). Results indicated that 68% of inpatients, 61% of outpatients and 21% of control subjects met all 3 criteria. Both treatment programmes were effective in returning patients to paid employment, whilst 3 control group patients gave up work. The cost-benefit implications of these changes are discussed. We conclude that pain management programmes contribute substantially to the rehabilitation of chronic pain sufferers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1381070     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90110-W

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  9 in total

Review 1.  Economic considerations in pain management.

Authors:  S A Schug; R G Large
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Management strategies for chronic pain.

Authors:  D M Justins
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Opioids for chronic pain of non-malignant origin--caring or crippling.

Authors:  R G Large; S A Schug
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1995-02

Review 4.  Philosophy and efficacy of multidisciplinary approach to chronic pain management.

Authors:  Akiko Okifuji; Dennis C Turk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  The impact of enrollment in a specialized interdisciplinary neuropathic pain clinic.

Authors:  Alexandra Garven; Shauna Brady; Susan Wood; Melinda Hatfield; Jennifer Bestard; Lawrence Korngut; Cory Toth
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 6.  Psychological assessment and treatment of patients with neuropathic pain.

Authors:  J A Haythornthwaite; L M Benrud-Larson
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-04

Review 7.  Treating patients with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care.

Authors:  Robert C Smith; Catherine Lein; Clare Collins; Judith S Lyles; Barbara Given; Francesca C Dwamena; John Coffey; AnneMarie Hodges; Joseph C Gardiner; John Goddeeris; C William Given
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Effects of nurse-led motivational interviewing of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in preparation of rehabilitation treatment (PREPARE) on societal participation, attendance level, and cost-effectiveness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vera-Christina Mertens; Mariëlle E J B Goossens; Jeanine A Verbunt; Albere J Köke; Rob J E M Smeets
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Influence of an outpatient multidisciplinary pain management program on the health-related quality of life and the physical fitness of chronic pain patients.

Authors:  Bettina Joos; Daniel Uebelhart; Beat A Michel; Haiko Sprott
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2004-03-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.