BACKGROUND:Oral eflornithine in combination with intravenous mitoguazone (methylbisguanylhydrazone) has shown activity against recurrent anaplastic gliomas. Eflornithine alone, however, has not been evaluated against recurrent gliomas. PURPOSE: This study compared the antitumor activity of oral eflornithine with that of oral eflornithine combined with intravenous mitoguazone in the treatment of patients with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma multiforme as well as nonglioblastoma anaplastic gliomas. METHODS: During the 1st year of therapy with eflornithine alone, the drug was given at a dose of 3.6 g/m2 on days 1-14, 22-35, and 43-56 every 8 hours; cycles were repeated every 63 days until progression. For the 2nd year, the drug was given on days 1-14, 29-42, and 57-70, with 84 days between cycles. For the 1st and 2nd years of eflornithine-mitoguazone therapy, eflornithine was given at 1.8 g/m2 on the same schedule. Mitoguazone was given intravenously at 200 mg/m2 on the final day of each 2-week sequence of eflornithine therapy. Response was determined by evaluating changes in the size of contrast-enhanced neuroimages. RESULTS: Because of two cases of lethal hepatic necrosis, the initial random allocation of patients to the eflornithine-mitoguazone arm was stopped after 23 patients had been accrued. Ninety-eight patients were entered in the eflornithine arm; 80 patients (36 glioblastoma multiforme patients and 44 anaplastic glioma patients) were assessable for response. Antitumor activity (partial response, minor response, and stable disease) was seen in 45% of the patients with anaplastic gliomas, for a median of 49 weeks, but in only 17% of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (median not attained). Twenty-one (20%) of the patients with anaplastic glioma and 33% of the patients with glioblastoma multiforme were removed from the study before completing the first 8-week course of therapy because of neurological deterioration and tumor progression by the 5th week of treatment. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that eflornithine alone is an effective palliative therapy for recurrent anaplastic gliomas. Additional studies are needed to confirm our finding.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Oral eflornithine in combination with intravenous mitoguazone (methylbisguanylhydrazone) has shown activity against recurrent anaplastic gliomas. Eflornithine alone, however, has not been evaluated against recurrent gliomas. PURPOSE: This study compared the antitumor activity of oral eflornithine with that of oral eflornithine combined with intravenous mitoguazone in the treatment of patients with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma multiforme as well as nonglioblastoma anaplastic gliomas. METHODS: During the 1st year of therapy with eflornithine alone, the drug was given at a dose of 3.6 g/m2 on days 1-14, 22-35, and 43-56 every 8 hours; cycles were repeated every 63 days until progression. For the 2nd year, the drug was given on days 1-14, 29-42, and 57-70, with 84 days between cycles. For the 1st and 2nd years of eflornithine-mitoguazone therapy, eflornithine was given at 1.8 g/m2 on the same schedule. Mitoguazone was given intravenously at 200 mg/m2 on the final day of each 2-week sequence of eflornithine therapy. Response was determined by evaluating changes in the size of contrast-enhanced neuroimages. RESULTS: Because of two cases of lethal hepatic necrosis, the initial random allocation of patients to the eflornithine-mitoguazone arm was stopped after 23 patients had been accrued. Ninety-eight patients were entered in the eflornithine arm; 80 patients (36 glioblastoma multiformepatients and 44 anaplastic gliomapatients) were assessable for response. Antitumor activity (partial response, minor response, and stable disease) was seen in 45% of the patients with anaplastic gliomas, for a median of 49 weeks, but in only 17% of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (median not attained). Twenty-one (20%) of the patients with anaplastic glioma and 33% of the patients with glioblastoma multiforme were removed from the study before completing the first 8-week course of therapy because of neurological deterioration and tumor progression by the 5th week of treatment. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that eflornithine alone is an effective palliative therapy for recurrent anaplastic gliomas. Additional studies are needed to confirm our finding.
Authors: Mattias Belting; Lubor Borsig; Mark M Fuster; Jillian R Brown; Lo Persson; Lars-Ake Fransson; Jeffrey D Esko Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-12-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: D F Deen; A Chiarodo; E A Grimm; J R Fike; M A Israel; L E Kun; V A Levin; L J Marton; R J Packer; A E Pegg Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 1993-06 Impact factor: 4.130