Literature DB >> 1379268

Improved sensitivity and specificity of a single measurement of serum progesterone over serial quantitative beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin in screening for ectopic pregnancy.

T G Stovall1, F W Ling, R N Andersen, J E Buster.   

Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of a single serum progesterone measurement was compared against two beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) measurements 48 h apart in screening for abnormal pregnancy, i.e. ectopic pregnancy, completed or incomplete abortion. Of 1120 patients in the first trimester presenting with a positive urinary pregnancy test, 116/1120 (10.4%) had an ectopic pregnancy, 755/1120 (67.4%) had ultrasonographically confirmed intra-uterine pregnancies, and 249/1120 (22.2%) had abnormal intra-uterine pregnancies documented as complete, incomplete or missed abortions. Of the ectopic pregnancies, 113/116 (97.4%) had a serum progesterone level less than 25 ng/ml while 516/755 (68.3%) viable intra-uterine pregnancies had a serum progesterone level greater than or equal to ng/ml. Of the 1120 patients screened, 402 (35.9%) had both a serum progesterone and two HCG measurements and were eligible for inclusion in this study. Setting a cut-off of 25 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity of a single serum progesterone measurement was then compared against two serial HCG measurements, utilizing receiver operating characteristic curves. This analysis demonstrated that a single serum progesterone measurement was significantly more sensitive (P less than 0.05) than two HCG measurements in screening for an abnormal pregnancy. In some patients, a single serum progesterone makes possible the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy 2 days earlier than two HCG determinations because a second blood sample was not required. We conclude that a single serum progesterone measurement should be added to serial HCG determinations as a standard diagnostic screening test for ectopic pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1379268     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Ectopic pregnancy--becoming a nonsurgical disorder.

Authors:  E D Schriock
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-08

Review 2.  Biomarkers for ectopic pregnancy and pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions, and outcome.

Authors:  Kurt Barnhart; Norah M van Mello; Tom Bourne; Emma Kirk; Ben Van Calster; Cecilia Bottomley; Karine Chung; George Condous; Steven Goldstein; Petra J Hajenius; Ben Willem Mol; Thomas Molinaro; Katherine L O'Flynn O'Brien; Richard Husicka; Mary Sammel; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Natural Micronized Progesterone Sustained Release (SR) and Luteal Phase: Role Redefined!!

Authors:  Sonia Malik; Korukonda Krishnaprasad
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

5.  Oral versus Vaginal Micronized Progesterone for the Treatment of Threatened Miscarriage.

Authors:  Rashida Parveen; Mehnaz Khakwani; Sobia Tabassum; Sajjad Masood
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Two embryos did not implant into the womb. A rare case of non-iatrogenic bilateral ectopic pregnancy (two-tailed tubal ectopic pregnancy) case report.

Authors:  Ghussoun Al Dus; Abd Ulmahdi Alhamoud; Nada Ata Allah; Joryya Alabdalla
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-10

Review 7.  A systematic review of dydrogesterone for the treatment of threatened miscarriage.

Authors:  Howard Carp
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.