Literature DB >> 1373681

Urinary mutagenic activity in workers exposed to diesel exhaust.

M B Schenker1, N Y Kado, S K Hammond, S J Samuels, S R Woskie, T J Smith.   

Abstract

We measured postshift urinary mutagenicity (mutu; n = 306 samples) on a population of railroad workers (n = 87) with a range of diesel exhaust exposures. Postshift urinary mutagenicity was determined by a sensitive microsuspension procedure using Salmonella strain TA98 +/- S9. Number of cigarettes smoked on the study day and urinary cotinine were highly correlated with postshift urinary mutagenicity. Diesel exhaust exposure was measured over the work shift by constant-flow personal sampling pumps. Respirable particle concentrations were adjusted for the contribution of environmental tobacco smoke, as estimated from nicotine concentration on treated filters. The relative ranking of jobs by this adjusted respirable particle concentration (ARP) was correlated with relative contact the job groups have with operating diesel locomotives. After adjustment for cigarette smoking (active and passive) in multiple regressions, there was no independent association of diesel exhaust exposure, as estimated by ARP, with postshift urinary mutagenicity among smokers or nonsmokers. An important finding is the detection of "baseline" mutagenicity in most of the nonsmoking workers. Despite the use of individual measurements of diesel exhaust exposure, the absence of a significant association in this study may be due to the low levels of diesel exposure, the lack of a specific marker for diesel exhaust exposure, and/or urinary mutagenicity levels from diesel exposure below the limit of sensitivity for the mutagenicity assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1373681     DOI: 10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80074-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  6 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer due to diesel soot particles in ambient air? A critical appraisal of epidemiological studies addressing this question.

Authors:  W Stöber; U R Abel
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Occupational exposure to diesel engine exhaust: a literature review.

Authors:  Anjoeka Pronk; Joseph Coble; Patricia A Stewart
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 3.  Exposure of U.S. workers to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  S K Hammond
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Diesel engine exhaust and lung cancer: an unproven association.

Authors:  J E Muscat; E L Wynder
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Environmental monitoring of secondhand smoke exposure.

Authors:  Benjamin J Apelberg; Lisa M Hepp; Erika Avila-Tang; Lara Gundel; S Katharine Hammond; Melbourne F Hovell; Andrew Hyland; Neil E Klepeis; Camille C Madsen; Ana Navas-Acien; James Repace; Jonathan M Samet; Patrick N Breysse
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Elevated urinary mutagenicity among those exposed to bituminous coal combustion emissions or diesel engine exhaust.

Authors:  Jason Y Y Wong; Roel Vermeulen; Yufei Dai; Wei Hu; W Kyle Martin; Sarah H Warren; Hannah K Liberatore; Dianzhi Ren; Huawei Duan; Yong Niu; Jun Xu; Wei Fu; Kees Meliefste; Jufang Yang; Meng Ye; Xiaowei Jia; Tao Meng; Bryan A Bassig; H Dean Hosgood; Jiyeon Choi; Mohammad L Rahman; Douglas I Walker; Yuxin Zheng; Judy Mumford; Debra T Silverman; Nathaniel Rothman; David M DeMarini; Qing Lan
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.579

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.