Literature DB >> 1373431

Enhanced neutrophil respiratory burst as a biological marker for manipulation forces: duration of the effect and association with substance P and tumor necrosis factor.

P C Brennan1, J J Triano, M McGregor, K Kokjohn, M A Hondras, D C Brennan.   

Abstract

A critical need in assessing the clinical utility of manipulative therapy for back pain is the identification of biological changes associated with the forces applied by spinal manipulation. Such changes could then serve as markers for both sham treatment and manipulation. We determined the priming of polymorphonuclear neutrophils for an enhanced respiratory burst and its duration, the priming of mononuclear cells for enhanced endotoxin-stimulated tumor necrosis factor production and plasma levels of substance P following a single thoracic spine manipulation. There was a significant difference in the respiratory burst of polymorphonuclear neutrophils in response to a particulate challenge, depending on the time of blood sample collection. The response of polymorphonuclear neutrophils isolated from blood collected 15 min after manipulation was significantly higher than the response of cells isolated from blood collected 15 min before and 30 and 45 min after manipulation. Mononuclear cells were also primed for enhanced endotoxin-stimulated tumor necrosis factor production by spinal manipulation. Both of these priming effects were accompanied by a slight, but significant elevation in plasma substance P. The mean manipulation force associated with these biological effects was 878 +/- 99 N. These biological effects may provide a means of monitoring the delivery of both sham and manipulative treatment and, therefore, provide a crucial tool for understanding the efficacy of manipulative therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1373431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  6 in total

1.  Distribution of cavitations as identified with accelerometry during lumbar spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; J Kim Ross; P K Raju; Jerrilyn A Cambron; Jennifer M Dexheimer; Preetam Bora; Ray McKinnis; Scott Selby; Adam R Habeck
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Evaluating the relationship among cavitation, zygapophyseal joint gapping, and spinal manipulation: an exploratory case series.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; Kim Ross; Judith Pocius; Joe A Cantu; Evelyn Laptook; Michael Fergus; Doug Gregerson; Scott Selby; P K Raju
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  The Physiological Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor in Human Immunity and Its Potential Implications in Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Chao Hua Yao
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-26

4.  Chiropractic at the crossroads or are we just going around in circles?

Authors:  John W Reggars
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2011-05-21

Review 5.  The Effects Induced by Spinal Manipulative Therapy on the Immune and Endocrine Systems.

Authors:  Andrea Colombi; Marco Testa
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Enhancement of in vitro interleukin-2 production in normal subjects following a single spinal manipulative treatment.

Authors:  Julita A Teodorczyk-Injeyan; H Stephen Injeyan; Marion McGregor; Glen M Harris; Richard Ruegg
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2008-05-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.