Literature DB >> 1371565

Prostate specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ confined and locally extensive prostate cancer.

A Stein1, J B deKernion, R B Smith, F Dorey, H Patel.   

Abstract

A total of 230 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy at UCLA (pathological stage T1-3 N0, M0). Classification into groups included 115 patients with organ confined disease (group 1), 82 with invasion into or through the capsule (group 2) and 33 with seminal vesicle involvement (group 3). Median followup was 48 months. The 10-year, cause-specific survival was 96%, 90% and 63%, and 5-year, clinical, disease-free survival was 91%, 79% and 58% for the 3 groups, respectively. Recent prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels were measured in most patients, even those operated upon many years ago. Of the patients 41 had detectable (0.4 ng./ml. or greater) PSA levels without any other clinical evidence of progression and 15 with clinical evidence of progression had PSA levels in the detectable range at the time of clinical progression. When isolated detectable PSA was also considered an indicator of progression the 5-year and 10-year, disease-free rates were 61% and 41%, respectively. These data show that radical prostatectomy performed in patients with even microscopic invasion into the capsule, positive margins and seminal vesicle involvement is associated with a higher clinical progression rate than organ confined disease. If isolated detectable PSA is also considered an indicator of recurrence the disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy might be less than indicated by previous studies. The relationship among survival, local tumor extension and PSA must be carefully examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1371565     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37429-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating radical prostatectomy specimens: therapeutic and prognostic importance.

Authors:  D G Bostwick; R Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Capromab pendetide. A review of its use as an imaging agent in prostate cancer.

Authors:  H M Lamb; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Treating prostate cancer in elderly men: how does aging affect the outcome?

Authors:  Abhay R Shelke; Supriya G Mohile
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-09

4.  Therapeutic strategies for localized prostate cancer I: surgery, ultrasound, adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  M I Resnick; E D Crawford; M E Gleave; J Lynch; J P Mulhall; K Pummer; G Vallancien
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

5.  Prostate cancer: epidemiology and screening.

Authors:  M K Brawer; E D Crawford; J Fowler; M S Lucia; F H Schröeder
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

6.  Nomograms for the prediction of pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men.

Authors:  Cheryn Song; Taejin Kang; Jae Y Ro; Moo-Song Lee; Choung-Soo Kim; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 7.  A brief review of ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen assays for the evaluation of patients after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  T K Takayama; R L Vessella; P H Lange
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Phase III Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation With or Without Mitoxantrone Plus Prednisone in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: SWOG S9921.

Authors:  Maha Hussain; Catherine M Tangen; Ian M Thompson; Gregory P Swanson; David P Wood; Wael Sakr; Nancy A Dawson; Naomi B Haas; Thomas W Flaig; Tanya B Dorff; Daniel W Lin; E David Crawford; David I Quinn; Nicholas J Vogelzang; L Michael Glode
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 9.  Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changhao Chen; Tianxin Lin; Yu Zhou; Doudou Li; Kewei Xu; Zhihua Li; Xinxiang Fan; Guangzheng Zhong; Wang He; Xu Chen; Xianyin He; Jian Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.