Literature DB >> 1371211

Treatment of progressive membranous glomerulopathy. A randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids with corticosteroids alone. The Glomerular Disease Collaborative Network.

R J Falk, S L Hogan, K E Muller, J C Jennette.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if deterioration in renal function could be ameliorated by adding cyclophosphamide to corticosteroid therapy in patients with progressive membranous glomerulopathy.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled treatment trial. Patients were followed for a mean of 29.2 +/- 17.1 months.
SETTING: Collaborative network of 120 university and private-practice nephrologists. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with membranous glomerulopathy whose renal function deteriorated (as evidenced by doubling of the serum creatinine level, a 50% fall in the glomerular filtration rate, or a sustained serum creatinine level of greater than 2.0 mg/dL [reciprocal creatinine value, 0.5], or whose nephrotic range proteinuria persisted in association with morbid complications. Of 156 patients with biopsy-proven membranous glomerulopathy, 36 became eligible for randomization. Twenty-six of these 36 patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the two treatments.
INTERVENTIONS: Pulse methylprednisolone, oral corticosteroids, and 6 months of intravenous cyclophosphamide or alternate-day corticosteroid therapy alone. MAIN
RESULTS: At entry, no statistical differences were found between the treatment groups in duration of renal disease, age, gender, serum creatinine level, 24-hour urine protein excretion, or biopsy stage. The groups showed no difference in mean arterial blood pressure during follow-up. Four of the 13 patients receiving corticosteroids alone and 4 of the 13 patients receiving corticosteroids plus intravenous cyclophosphamide progressed to end-stage renal disease during follow-up. Reciprocal creatinine values tested at 6-month intervals showed no statistical differences between treatment groups at any time point. The log of the 24-hour protein excretion values showed no statistical differences between treatment groups after treatment. The power to detect a substantial improvement in renal function, defined as a doubling of the reciprocal of the serum creatinine, at the 0.05 significance level was 0.92.
CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with intravenous cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids, when compared with corticosteroid therapy alone, does not improve renal function in patients with progressive membranous glomerulopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1371211     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-6-438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  15 in total

1.  Venous thromboembolism in patients with membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Sophia Lionaki; Vimal K Derebail; Susan L Hogan; Sean Barbour; Taewoo Lee; Michelle Hladunewich; Allen Greenwald; Yichun Hu; Caroline E Jennette; J Charles Jennette; Ronald J Falk; Daniel C Cattran; Patrick H Nachman; Heather N Reich
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  BIAS IN LINEAR MODEL POWER AND SAMPLE SIZE DUE TO ESTIMATING VARIANCE.

Authors:  Keith E Muller; Virginia B Pasour
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 0.893

3.  Computing Confidence Bounds for Power and Sample Size of the General Linear Univariate Model.

Authors:  Douglas J Taylor; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 8.710

Review 4.  Immunosuppressive treatment for primary membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  Thilo C von Groote; Gabrielle Williams; Eric H Au; Yizhi Chen; Anna T Mathew; Elisabeth M Hodson; David J Tunnicliffe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-15

5.  Substitution of Oral for Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Membranous Nephropathy.

Authors:  Leonella Luzardo; Gabriela Ottati; Jimena Cabrera; Hernando Trujillo; Mariela Garau; Carlota González Bedat; Ruben Coitiño; María H Aunchayna; José Santiago; Graciela Baldovinos; Ricardo Silvariño; Alejandro Ferreiro; Francisco González-Martínez; Liliana Gadola; Oscar Noboa; Hena Caorsi
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-08-07

Review 6.  Immunosuppression for membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.

Authors:  Yizhi Chen; Arrigo Schieppati; Guangyan Cai; Xiangmei Chen; Javier Zamora; Giovanni A Giuliano; Norbert Braun; Annalisa Perna
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Factors contributing to the outcome in 100 adult patients with idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  T Tóth; S Takebayashi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Controversies in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Meryl Waldman; Howard A Austin
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 9.  Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: management strategies.

Authors:  Marco Quaglia; Piero Stratta
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Chapter 7: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)       Date:  2012-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.