Literature DB >> 1370362

MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5 T.

L Yao1, S Sinha, L L Seeger.   

Abstract

To clarify the choice of imaging parameters for optimal gradient-recalled echo MR scanning of joints, we analyzed the behavior of contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios for spoiled (i.e., fast low-angle shot [FLASH] or spoiled GRASS) and steady-state (i.e., gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state [GRASS] or fast imaging with steady precession) techniques at 1.5 T. The analysis is based on tissue characteristics derived from spin-echo measurements of hyaline cartilage and synovial fluid signal in the patellofemoral joints of 11 volunteers. Separate analysis of contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios for multiplanar (long TR) acquisitions shows that these parameters are each improved compared with single-slice methods. At TRs greater than 250 msec, there is no significant difference in the contrast behavior of FLASH and GRASS. For optimal contrast-to-noise ratio (synovial fluid-cartilage), the best multiplanar sequence (for TE less than 23 msec) is with a short TE and a large flip angle (e.g., 400/9/73 degrees [TR/TE/flip angle]). If a single-scan or three-dimensional technique is desired, than a GRASS sequence at minimal TR and TE and intermediate flip angle (18/9/32 degrees) is best. For optimal signal-to-noise ratio (for both synovial fluid and hyaline cartilage), the best multiplanar sequence uses a short TE and an intermediate flip angle (e.g., 400/9/30 degrees). If a short TR, high signal-to-noise technique is desired, then GRASS (18/9/13 degrees) is superior to FLASH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1370362     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.2.1370362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Blood oxygen level dependent angiography (BOLDangio) and its potential applications in cancer research.

Authors:  Kejia Cai; Adam Shore; Anup Singh; Mohammad Haris; Teruyuki Hiraki; Prianka Waghray; Damodar Reddy; Joel H Greenberg; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Optimizing joint imaging: MR imaging techniques.

Authors:  G Adam; M Drobnitzky; C C Nolte-Ernsting; R W Günther
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  High-Resolution Qualitative and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of the Glenoid Labrum.

Authors:  Kenyu Iwasaki; Monica Tafur; Eric Y Chang; Sheronda Statum; Reni Biswas; Betty Tran; Won C Bae; Jiang Du; Graeme M Bydder; Christine B Chung
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Subchondral bone and cartilage thickness from MRI: effects of chemical-shift artifact.

Authors:  Chris A McGibbon; Jenny Bencardino; William E Palmer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  The morphology of articular cartilage assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Reproducibility and anatomical correlation.

Authors:  F Eckstein; H Sittek; S Milz; R Putz; M Reiser
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Detecting low blood concentrations in joints using T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5, 3, and 7 T: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Flora H P van Leeuwen; Beatrice Lena; Jaco J M Zwanenburg; Lize F D van Vulpen; Lambertus W Bartels; Kathelijn Fischer; Frank J Nap; Pim A de Jong; Clemens Bos; Wouter Foppen
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-12-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.