Literature DB >> 13680085

Effects of methylphenidate on impulsive choice in adult humans.

Cynthia J Pietras1, Don R Cherek, Scott D Lane, Oleg V Tcheremissine, Joel L Steinberg.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Several studies with nonhumans and humans have shown that stimulants decrease impulsive choices on delay-to-reinforcement (self-control) procedures. Little is known, however, about the effects of the stimulant methylphenidate on choice for delayed reinforcers in humans.
OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to investigate the effects of acute methylphenidate administrations on impulsive responding in adult humans on a delay-to-reinforcement task.
METHODS: Eleven adult males with a history of criminal behavior but no history of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) participated. Impulsive responding was measured using an adjusting-delay procedure in which subjects were presented with repeated choices between a small amount of money delivered after a short delay and a larger amount of money delivered after a delay that adjusted as a function of previous choices. Subjects were exposed to four experimental sessions each day of participation and 60 min prior to the first daily session received placebo or 0.15, 0.30, or 0.60 mg/kg methylphenidate. Stable choice patterns were re-established between each methylphenidate dose.
RESULTS: Individuals differed in their sensitivity to methylphenidate, but in over half of the subjects methylphenidate decreased impulsive (i.e., increased the number of self-control choices) and increased the delay to the large reinforcer. The largest increases in self-control choices tended to occur at the 0.30-mg/kg and 0.60-mg/kg doses, and the effects often persisted across multiple daily sessions. In six subjects, under at least one methylphenidate dose, the number of impulsive choices decreased to zero.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute methylphenidate administrations tended to decrease the number of impulsive choices in adult humans on an adjusting-delay procedure, although there were substantial individual differences in the sensitivity of choice to methylphenidate. In no case, however, did methylphenidate increase impulsive choices. These results are consistent with several recent laboratory studies with nonhumans and humans showing that stimulants increase preference for large, delayed reinforcers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13680085     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1547-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  43 in total

1.  Laboratory and psychometric measurements of impulsivity among violent and nonviolent female parolees.

Authors:  D R Cherek; S D Lane
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  The go-no go test in attention deficit disorder is sensitive to methylphenidate.

Authors:  B L Trommer; J A Hoeppner; S G Zecker
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.987

3.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Acute effects of baclofen, a gamma-aminobutyric acid-B agonist, on laboratory measures of aggressive and escape responses of adult male parolees with and without a history of conduct disorder.

Authors:  Don R Cherek; Scott D Lane; Cynthia J Pietras; Jennifer Sharon; Joel L Steinberg
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Effects of methamphetamine on the adjusting amount procedure, a model of impulsive behavior in rats.

Authors:  J B Richards; K E Sabol; H de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Effects of stimulants on the continuous performance test (CPT): implications for CPT use and interpretation.

Authors:  C A Riccio; J J Waldrop; C R Reynolds; P Lowe
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.198

7.  Locomotor effects of acute and repeated threshold doses of amphetamine and methylphenidate: relative roles of dopamine and norepinephrine.

Authors:  R Kuczenski; D S Segal
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  The Wender Utah Rating Scale: an aid in the retrospective diagnosis of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  M F Ward; P H Wender; F W Reimherr
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Methylphenidate and cognitive therapy with ADD children: a methodological reconsideration.

Authors:  R T Brown; K A Borden; M E Wynne; R Schleser; S R Clingerman
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1986-12

10.  Dextroamphetamine. Its cognitive and behavioral effects in normal and hyperactive boys and normal men.

Authors:  J L Rapoport; M S Buchsbaum; H Weingartner; T P Zahn; C Ludlow; E J Mikkelsen
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1980-08
View more
  30 in total

1.  Beneficial effects of electrostimulation contingencies on sustained attention and electrocortical activity.

Authors:  Max Jean-Lon Chen; Trevor Thompson; Juri Kropotov; John H Gruzelier
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.243

2.  Effects of methylphenidate and morphine on delay-discount functions obtained within sessions.

Authors:  Raymond C Pitts; A Patrick McKinney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement delay.

Authors:  Wei-Min Ta; Raymond C Pitts; Christine E Hughes; Anthony P McLean; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Dissociable roles of dopamine and serotonin transporter function in a rat model of negative urgency.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Mahesh Darna; Cassandra D Gipson; Linda P Dwoskin; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.

Authors:  L Valencia Torres; S da Costa Araújo; C M Olarte Sanchez; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Pharmacotherapies for decreasing maladaptive choice in drug addiction: Targeting the behavior and the drug.

Authors:  Frank N Perkins; Kevin B Freeman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Methylphenidate and fluphenazine, but not amphetamine, differentially affect impulsive choice in spontaneously hypertensive, Wistar-Kyoto and Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Thomas E Wooters; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 8.  Animal models to guide clinical drug development in ADHD: lost in translation?

Authors:  Jeffery R Wickens; Brian I Hyland; Gail Tripp
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Impulsivity (delay discounting) as a predictor of acquisition of IV cocaine self-administration in female rats.

Authors:  Jennifer L Perry; Erin B Larson; Jonathan P German; Gregory J Madden; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Differences in impulsivity on a delay-discounting task predict self-administration of a low unit dose of methylphenidate in rats.

Authors:  Julie A Marusich; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.