Literature DB >> 1360678

Cerebral visual motion blindness: transitory akinetopsia induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area V5.

G Beckers1, V Hömberg.   

Abstract

The perception of visual motion can be selectively and reversibly compromised by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of a small region of cortex, roughly 1 cm in diameter and corresponding in position to human area V5. The reversible inactivation of a small and specialized visual area which receives its predominant input from area V1 and sends a powerful return (re-entrant) input back to it allowed us to study for the first time the backward influence of area V5 on area V1. In contrast to the complete and temporary visual motion blindness which occurs during stimulation of V5, a less-prominent interference with the perception of visual motion occurs at 70-80 ms after the onset of the visual stimulus when TMS is applied to V1. Because V5 is critical for the perception of coherent motion, and because an intact re-entry of signals from V5 to V1 is essential for the conscious perception of visual motion, the results obtained with stimulation of V1 must be caused by a disruption of the re-entrant signals from V5 to V1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1360678     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  35 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Bartres-Faz; J P Keenan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Motion opponency in visual cortex.

Authors:  D J Heeger; G M Boynton; J B Demb; E Seidemann; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-27

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation over MT/MST fails to impair judgments of implied motion.

Authors:  James L Alford; Paul van Donkelaar; Paul Dassonville; Richard T Marrocco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Zaira Cattaneo; Lorella Battelli; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A double dissociation between striate and extrastriate visual cortex for pattern motion perception revealed using rTMS.

Authors:  Benjamin Thompson; Craig Aaen-Stockdale; Lisa Koski; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Learning to see again: biological constraints on cortical plasticity and the implications for sight restoration technologies.

Authors:  Michael Beyeler; Ariel Rokem; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Human visual motion areas determined individually by magnetoencephalography and 3D magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Bundo; Y Kaneoke; S Inao; J Yoshida; A Nakamura; R Kakigi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; D J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The lateral-occipital and the inferior-frontal cortex play different roles during the naming of visually presented objects.

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; Robert L Whitwell; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.