Literature DB >> 1354997

Evidence for presynaptic dopamine mechanisms underlying amphetamine-conditioned locomotion.

S L DiLullo1, M T Martin-Iverson.   

Abstract

Rats with a history of receiving (+)-amphetamine in a specific environment exhibit a conditioned psychomotor response when subsequently placed in that environment without drug treatment. Previous work has shown that while the unconditioned effects of amphetamine can be blocked by dopamine D1 or D2 receptor antagonists or with alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, conditioned locomotion is not influenced by these treatments. In the present experiment, alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine (50 mg/kg, s.c.) was given in conjunction with amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, s.c.) for 8 days before testing for conditioned locomotion. alpha-Methyl-p-tyrosine completely blocked amphetamine-induced locomotion but only attenuated amphetamine-conditioned locomotion. Reserpine (reduced over the 8 days from 2.5 to 1.25 mg/kg, i.p.) did not block amphetamine-induced locomotion; indeed, potentiation of amphetamine-induced locomotor activity was observed on the last 3 days of treatment. Reserpine treatment in conjunction with alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine treatment blocked amphetamine-induced locomotion for the first 4 days only, with full recovery of amphetamine-induced unconditioned locomotion by the last treatment day. Reserpine alone had no effect on amphetamine-conditioned locomotion, but completely blocked amphetamine-conditioned locomotion when given with alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine. It is concluded that the alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine-sensitive pool of dopamine mediates the immediate psychomotor effects of amphetamine, but that both the alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine- and reserpine-sensitive pools of dopamine are involved in the establishment of amphetamine-conditioned locomotion. In addition, the occurrence of amphetamine-conditioned locomotion is independent of the direct effects of amphetamine on locomotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1354997     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90244-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  5 in total

1.  Differences in the cellular mechanism underlying the effects of amphetamine on prepulse inhibition in apomorphine-susceptible and apomorphine-unsusceptible rats.

Authors:  Martine C J van der Elst; Yvette S Wunderink; Bart A Ellenbroek; Alexander R Cools
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of nimodipine and/or haloperidol on the expression of conditioned locomotion and sensitization to cocaine in rats.

Authors:  M T Martin-Iverson; A R Reimer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Behavioral sensitization and tolerance to cocaine and the occupation of dopamine receptors by dopamine.

Authors:  M T Martin-Iverson; L Y Burger
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1995 Aug-Dec       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Individual differences in sugar intake predict the locomotor response to acute and repeated amphetamine administration.

Authors:  T L Sills; F J Vaccarino
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Nimodipine and haloperidol attenuate behavioural sensitization to cocaine but only nimodipine blocks the establishment of conditioned locomotion induced by cocaine.

Authors:  A R Reimer; M T Martin-Iverson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.