Literature DB >> 1352135

Risk factors in perforated peptic ulcer disease: comparison of a new score system with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index.

G Altaca1, I Sayek, D Onat, M Cakmakçi, S Kamiloğlu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To construct a score that would accurately predict outcome for patients with perforated peptic ulcers.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University Hospital.
SUBJECTS: 173 patients who were operated on for perforated peptic duodenal ulcers over a 14 year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of multivariate discriminant function analysis of derived set of clinical variables known to be associated with high mortality, and comparison with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index.
RESULTS: Serious coexisting medical illness, acute renal failure, white cell count of more than 20 x 10(9)/l, and male sex were the most significant factors influencing mortality. The Hacettepe score for perforated peptic ulcer was established using these four variables. The sensitivity was 83%, the specificity 94%, and the overall predictive accuracy 93%. The corresponding figures for the Mannheim Peritonitis Index were 75%, 96%, and 94% respectively.
CONCLUSION: The Hacettepe score is useful in predicting whether a patient will survive after perforation of a peptic duodenal ulcer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1352135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  8 in total

1.  Low serum albumin may predict the need for gastric resection in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  J G Seow; Y R Lim; V G Shelat
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Cost effective management of duodenal ulcers in Uganda: interventions based on a series of seven cases.

Authors:  Gabriel R Nzarubara
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Effect of a pneumoperitoneum on the extent and severity of peritonitis induced by gastric ulcer perforation in the rat.

Authors:  C Bloechle; A Emmermann; H Treu; E Achilles; D Mack; C Zornig; C E Broelsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A prospective cohort study of postoperative complications in the management of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Smita S Sharma; Manju R Mamtani; Mamta S Sharma; Hemant Kulkarni
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Effect of acute peritonitis on rocuronium-induced intraperitoneal pressure reduction and the uptake function of the sarcoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  Jian-You Zhang; Yuan Gong; Mei-Rong Yang; Jin Wu; Shi-Tong Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Pre-operative risk scores for the prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgery.

Authors:  Thomas E Rix; Tom Bates
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Assessing the risk: Scoring systems for outcome prediction in emergency laparotomies.

Authors:  Deb Sanjay Nag
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2015-11-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.