Literature DB >> 1347478

Factors affecting blood stem cell collections following high-dose cyclophosphamide mobilization in lymphoma, myeloma and solid tumors.

D Kotasek1, K M Shepherd, R E Sage, B M Dale, J E Norman, P Charles, A Gregg, A Pillow, A Bolton.   

Abstract

Sixty patients with malignancy were enrolled in a study of high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). Stem cells were harvested prior to PBSCT using high-dose cyclophosphamide (CY) mobilization (4 or 7 g/m2) with collection of a median of 4.6 x 10(8)/kg mononuclear cells (range 0.2-9.5) and 21.6 x 10(4)/kg colony forming unit-granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) (range 0.1-220). Forty-seven patients were mobilized once, 11 required two cycles and two required three cycles. Eight patients (13%) failed to reach the optimum CFU-GM target (greater than 15 x 10(4)/kg) following CY mobilization. A number of factors identified those patients who were likely to achieve optimum CFU-GM collections with CY mobilization. These included the use of the higher CY mobilization dose, a longer interval from last chemotherapy cycle to mobilization, and a higher premobilization bone marrow CFU-GM level. Patient's age, the degree of bone marrow infiltration, the nature of disease or the number of pre-mobilization chemotherapeutic cycles did not affect the ability to collect optimum CFU-GM numbers. Whilst the mobilization procedure was associated with moderate non-hematologic toxicity, significant hematological morbidity was observed primarily in patients mobilized using the 7 g/m2 dose. Refinements to the protocol, in particular the use of hematopoietic growth factors, are currently under investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1347478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  10 in total

Review 1.  Autotransplants with peripheral blood stem cells and clinical results obtained in children: a review.

Authors:  K Leibundgut; A Hirt; A R Lüthy; A Tobler; H P Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Reduced bone marrow stem cell pool and progenitor mobilisation in multiple myeloma after melphalan treatment.

Authors:  L M Knudsen; T Rasmussen; L Jensen; H E Johnsen
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Physiological aspects of aging. Implications for the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  S M Lichtman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  G Grignani; P G Gobbi; R Formisano; C Pieresca; G Ucci; S Brugnatelli; A Riccardi; E Ascari
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  [Problems and progress of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma].

Authors:  J R Liu; J Li; X J Huang
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-14

6.  Cancers after HLA-matched related bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia.

Authors:  Phuong Vo; Lynn Onstad; Mary E Flowers; Rainer Storb
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Effect of alternating combination chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cisplatin, and etoposide for small cell lung cancer on hematopoietic progenitors in the peripheral blood.

Authors:  E Shimizu; A Yamamoto; Y Takahashi; K Maniwa; S Yoshida; J Mukai; Y Takaue; T Ogura
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  A comparative review of colony-stimulating factors.

Authors:  J Nemunaitis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.431

Review 9.  Increased mobilization and yield of stem cells using plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Louis M Pelus; Sherif S Farag
Journal:  Stem Cells Cloning       Date:  2011-02-27

10.  Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children.

Authors:  José Eugenio Vázquez Meraz; José Arellano-Galindo; Armando Martínez Avalos; Emma Mendoza-García; Elva Jiménez-Hernández
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.443

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.