Literature DB >> 1347267

Placebo controlled comparison of acute effects of ebastine and clemastine on performance and EEG.

H Hopes1, G H Meuret, W Ungethüm, G Leopold, H Wiemann.   

Abstract

The effects of single oral doses of 10 and 20 mg ebastine were compared with placebo and 2 mg clemastine in a double-blind cross-over study in 16 healthy male volunteers. Clemastine produced the known pattern of changes, namely impairment of psychomotor performance, drowsiness, and a selective effect on cognitive processes. Earlier encoding in a perceptual stage was slowed whereas abstract classification processes were not affected. Electrophysiological measures of vigilance showed a general decrease in vigilance especially 2.5 and 4.5 h after dosing. In contrast at no time was any effect of ebastine different from that of the placebo. Ebastine 10 and 20 mg differed positively from clemastine in its effect on pursuit tracking, subjective rating of drowsiness and general discomfort. Ebastine 10 mg also differed positively from clemastine in the EEG features of vigilance. It is concluded that 10 and 20 mg ebastine were free from sedative adverse effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1347267     DOI: 10.1007/bf00314920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  8 in total

1.  The pharmacokinetics, antihistamine and concentration-effect relationship of ebastine in healthy subjects.

Authors:  J Vincent; R Liminana; P A Meredith; J L Reid
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Performance studies with antihistamines.

Authors:  C H Clarke; A N Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Selective effects of barbiturate and amphetamine on information processing and response execution.

Authors:  H W Frowein
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1981-02

4.  A comparison of triprolidine and clemastine on histamine antagonism and performance tests in man: implications for the mechanism of drug induced drowsiness.

Authors:  A W Peck; A S Fowle; C Bye
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-08-14       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Chronometric analysis of classification.

Authors:  M I Posner; R F Mitchell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Single and repeated dose comparison of three antihistamines and phenylpropanolamine: psychomotor performance and subjective appraisals of sleep.

Authors:  T Seppälä; E Nuotto; K Korttila
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  In vivo pharmacology of astemizole, a new type of H1-antihistaminic compound.

Authors:  J Van Wauwe; F Awouters; C J Neimegeers; F Janssens; J M Van Nueten; P A Janssen
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1981-05

8.  Contribution to the search for vigilance-indicative EEG variables. Results of a controlled, double-blind study with pyritinol in elderly patients with symptoms of mental dysfunction.

Authors:  W M Herrmann; U Kern; J Röhmel
Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.788

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Comparative clinical studies with ebastine: efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  X Luria
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of H1-antihistamines.

Authors:  J P Desager; Y Horsmans
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  The antihistamines of the nineties.

Authors:  M M Janssens; P H Howarth
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1993

Review 4.  Ebastine. a review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the treatment of allergic disorders.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Differential cognitive effects of ebastine and (+)-chlorpheniramine in healthy subjects: correlation between cognitive impairment and plasma drug concentration.

Authors:  Masaaki Tagawa; Michiko Kano; Nobuyuki Okamura; Makoto Higuchi; Michiaki Matsuda; Yasuyuki Mizuki; Hiroyuki Arai; Toshihiko Fujii; Sadao Komemushi; Masatoshi Itoh; Hidetada Sasaki; Takehiko Watanabe; Kazuhiko Yanai
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Acute and subchronic effects of the H1-histamine receptor antagonist ebastine in 10, 20 and 30 mg dose, and triprolidine 10 mg on car driving performance.

Authors:  K A Brookhuis; G De Vries; D De Waard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Cimetidine does not influence the metabolism of the H1-receptor antagonist ebastine to its active metabolite carebastine.

Authors:  J Van Rooij; H C Schoemaker; R Bruno; J F Reinhoudt; D D Breimer; A F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Ebastine in the light of CONGA recommendations for the development of third-generation antihistamines.

Authors:  S Rico; Rm Antonijoan; Mj Barbanoj
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2009-08-31

Review 9.  Central nervous system effects of the second-generation antihistamines marketed in Japan--review of inter-drug differences using the proportional impairment ratio (PIR)-.

Authors:  Tatsuya Isomura; Takeshi Kono; Ian Hindmarch; Norimasa Kikuchi; Aya Murakami; Kyoko Inuzuka; Seiji Kawana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Latent tuberculosis: interaction of virulence factors in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Sadhana Sundararajan; Rajiniraja Muniyan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.316

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.