Literature DB >> 11874393

Differential cognitive effects of ebastine and (+)-chlorpheniramine in healthy subjects: correlation between cognitive impairment and plasma drug concentration.

Masaaki Tagawa1, Michiko Kano, Nobuyuki Okamura, Makoto Higuchi, Michiaki Matsuda, Yasuyuki Mizuki, Hiroyuki Arai, Toshihiko Fujii, Sadao Komemushi, Masatoshi Itoh, Hidetada Sasaki, Takehiko Watanabe, Kazuhiko Yanai.   

Abstract

AIMS: It has been widely recognized that classical antihistamines induce sedation as an adverse effect, while second-generation antihistamines have few if any sedative effects. In order to evaluate the sedative properties of ebastine, a second-generation antihistamine, its effect on cognitive performance in healthy subjects was compared with placebo and (+)-chlorpheniramine.
METHODS: Twelve healthy male subjects were instructed to perform six types of attention-demanding cognitive tasks, and objective measurements of reaction times and accuracy was made before and after drug administration. Their sleepiness levels were also monitored. Test drugs were ebastine 10 mg, placebo and two doses of (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg and 6 mg, as positive controls. Plasma drug concentrations at the end of the study were analysed.
RESULTS: After treatments with (+)-chlorpheniramine, the reaction times of the tasks were significantly prolonged (e.g. ratios of after/before dosing: placebo (0.998 +/- 0.113) vs (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg (1.103 +/- 0.083; P<0.05) or (+)-chlorpheniramine 6 mg (1.170 +/- 0.139; P<0.001) in a 7 ms visual discrimination time task) and the accuracy was significantly decreased (e.g. ratios: placebo (1.038 +/- 0.158) vs (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg (0.792 +/- 0.202; P<0.01) or (+)-chlorpheniramine 6 mg (0.837 +/- 0.222; P<0.05) in a 7 ms task). On the other hand, performance was not affected by ebastine or placebo treatment (e.g. ebastine 10 mg (reaction time ratio; 1.014 +/- 0.067 and accuracy ratio; 0.990 +/- 0.146) in a 7 ms task). Subjective sleepiness was also not affected by ebastine but (+)-chlorpheniramine significantly increased sedation. With respect to the relationship between plasma drug concentrations and task performance, the latter deteriorated with an increase in plasma (+)-chlorpheniramine concentration (e.g. r=0.439 (P=0.007) in a 5 ms and r = 0.352 (P=0.039) in a 7 ms task), but it did not correlate with the plasma concentration of carebastine, an active metabolite of ebastine.
CONCLUSIONS: Ebastine 10 mg did not cause any cognitive impairment or subjective sleepiness. On the other hand, (+)-chlorpheniramine impaired cognitive function and induced sleepiness even at 2 mg, the recommended dose in over-the-counter medication. In addition, impaired CNS performance was significantly correlated with plasma (+)-chlorpheniramine concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11874393      PMCID: PMC1874306          DOI: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01183.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  27 in total

1.  Comparative clinical studies with ebastine: efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  X Luria
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Performance studies with antihistamines.

Authors:  C H Clarke; A N Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Simultaneous determination of the histamine H1-receptor antagonist ebastine and its two metabolites, carebastine and hydroxyebastine, in human plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  M Matsuda; Y Mizuki; Y Terauchi
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl       Date:  2001-06-05

4.  Some clinical pharmacological studies with terfenadine, a new antihistamine drug.

Authors:  V K Kulshrestha; P P Gupta; P Turner; J Wadsworth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach.

Authors:  E Hoddes; V Zarcone; H Smythe; R Phillips; W C Dement
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Metabolism of chlorpheniramine maleate in man.

Authors:  E A Peets; M Jackson; S Symchowicz
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Incidence and toxicological aspects of drugs detected in 484 fatally injured drivers and pedestrians in Ontario.

Authors:  G Cimbura; D M Lucas; R C Bennett; R A Warren; H M Simpson
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 8.  Sedative effects of antihistamines: safety, performance, learning, and quality of life.

Authors:  T M Nolen
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Transport of diphenhydramine in the central nervous system.

Authors:  M J Goldberg; R Spector; C K Chiang
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Simple and sensitive method for the determination of chlorpheniramine maleate in human plasma using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Takeshi Takagaki; Michiaki Matsuda; Yasuyuki Mizuki; Yoshiaki Terauchi
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2002-09-05       Impact factor: 3.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Brain histamine H receptor occupancy of orally administered antihistamines measured by positron emission tomography with (11)C-doxepin in a placebo-controlled crossover study design in healthy subjects: a comparison of olopatadine and ketotifen.

Authors:  Manabu Tashiro; Hideki Mochizuki; Yumiko Sakurada; Kenji Ishii; Keiichi Oda; Yuichi Kimura; Toru Sasaki; Kiichi Ishiwata; Kazuhiko Yanai
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Brain histamine modulates recognition memory: possible implications in major cognitive disorders.

Authors:  Gustavo Provensi; Alessia Costa; Ivan Izquierdo; Patrizio Blandina; Maria Beatrice Passani
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Neuroimaging of histamine H1-receptor occupancy in human brain by positron emission tomography (PET): a comparative study of ebastine, a second-generation antihistamine, and (+)-chlorpheniramine, a classical antihistamine.

Authors:  M Tagawa; M Kano; N Okamura; M Higuchi; M Matsuda; Y Mizuki; H Arai; R Iwata; T Fujii; S Komemushi; T Ido; M Itoh; H Sasaki; T Watanabe; K Yanai
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Block of HERG k channel by classic histamine h(1) receptor antagonist chlorpheniramine.

Authors:  Hee-Kyung Hong; Su-Hyun Jo
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.016

5.  Brain histamine H1 receptor occupancy of orally administered antihistamines, bepotastine and diphenhydramine, measured by PET with 11C-doxepin.

Authors:  Manabu Tashiro; Xudong Duan; Motohisa Kato; Masayasu Miyake; Shoichi Watanuki; Yoichi Ishikawa; Yoshihito Funaki; Ren Iwata; Masatoshi Itoh; Kazuhiko Yanai
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Safety of Ramucirumab Regimen Without H1-antihistamine Premedication in Patients With Solid Cancers.

Authors:  Emi Goto; Toshifumi Yamaguchi; Nobuhiro Hattori; Masahiro Goto; Masami Nishihara; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Yoshiyuki Rikitake
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Ebastine in the light of CONGA recommendations for the development of third-generation antihistamines.

Authors:  S Rico; Rm Antonijoan; Mj Barbanoj
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2009-08-31

Review 8.  Central nervous system effects of the second-generation antihistamines marketed in Japan--review of inter-drug differences using the proportional impairment ratio (PIR)-.

Authors:  Tatsuya Isomura; Takeshi Kono; Ian Hindmarch; Norimasa Kikuchi; Aya Murakami; Kyoko Inuzuka; Seiji Kawana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.