Literature DB >> 1341222

Outcomes management in heart valve replacement surgery: early experience.

R C Phillips1, D J Lansky.   

Abstract

Recent efforts at reducing health care expenditures and practice variations have focused attention on treatment appropriateness, patient preference, and quality of life as important elements of treatment evaluation. These characteristics of medical treatment can be assessed by administration of a structured, valid health status assessment questionnaire before and at fixed intervals following treatment, and standardized scores may be compared to normal scores derived from healthy, untreated populations. One hundred valve replacement patients completed a standardized questionnaire, the 'SF-36', preoperatively and at 1- and 6-months postoperatively. Preoperatively, valve replacement patients are substantially impaired in their physical capacity, their ability to function in important roles, and their vitality. At one month, they report significant decrements in social and role functioning and in pain which we attribute to the trauma of surgery and recovery. At six months, mean scores approximate those for sex- and age-matched normals except for persistent moderate impairment in role functioning. Post-operative functional impairment is greatest for those undergoing mitral valve replacement, particularly when coronary artery grafts are performed concurrently, and for patients receiving bioprosthetic valves. Structured health status assessment provides a useful adjunct to other methods of assessing clinical status and evaluating treatment outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1341222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  18 in total

1.  The Canadian SF-36 health survey: normative data add to its value.

Authors:  S Wood-Dauphinee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  [Perioperative pain therapy for knee endoprosthetics].

Authors:  K J Wagner; E F Kochs; V Krautheim; L Gerdesmeyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Comparison between exploratory factor-analytic and SEM-based approaches to constructing SF-36 summary scores.

Authors:  Fotios Anagnostopoulos; Dimitris Niakas; Yannis Tountas
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; C Acquadro; J Alonso; G Apolone; D Bucquet; M Bullinger; K Bungay; S Fukuhara; B Gandek; S Keller
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions.

Authors:  A M Garratt; D A Ruta; M I Abdalla; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-12

6.  A questionnaire to assess the generic and disease-specific health outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  M S Bayliss; B Gandek; K M Bungay; D Sugano; M A Hsu; J E Ware
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Health services research: what is being done, why do it at all?

Authors:  E G Jessop
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Health-related quality of life after elective surgery: measurement of longitudinal changes.

Authors:  C M Mangione; L Goldman; E J Orav; E R Marcantonio; A Pedan; L E Ludwig; M C Donaldson; D J Sugarbaker; R Poss; T H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

Authors:  C A McHorney; A R Tarlov
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Longitudinal sensitivity of generic and specific health measures in chronic sinusitis.

Authors:  R E Gliklich; J M Hilinski
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.