Literature DB >> 1332732

A quantitative comparison of taste reactivity behaviors to sucrose before and after lithium chloride pairings: a unidimensional account of palatability.

P A Breslin1, A C Spector, H J Grill.   

Abstract

Alterations in the motivation to ingest sucrose can be quantified by measuring the number and type of oral motor and somatic responses (i.e., taste reactivity [TR]) that are elicited by sucrose. In 2 experiments, rats had intraorally infused sucrose paired with LiCl injections for several trials, or they were injected with LiCl and had sucrose infused every 5 min during the 30-min postinjection period (data from Spector, Breslin, & Grill, 1988). In both experiments, ingestive TR responses decreased, whereas aversive TR responses increased over trials. Individual response components that comprise the ingestive and aversive categories followed the same trends of increase or decrease but changed at different rates as a function of number of trials or exposures. Overall, the array of response components could be projected onto a single unidimensional scale of palatability to capture the motivational states that ranged from acceptance to rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1332732     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.106.5.820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  29 in total

1.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Joe Arthurs; Jian-You Lin; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Altering salivary protein profile can decrease aversive oromotor responding to quinine in rats.

Authors:  Laura E Martin; Kristen E Kay; Kimberly F James; Ann-Marie Torregrossa
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-06-09

3.  Effects of the FAAH inhibitor, URB597, and anandamide on lithium-induced taste reactivity responses: a measure of nausea in the rat.

Authors:  Shelley K Cross-Mellor; Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp; Daniele Piomelli; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Appetitive sensitization by amphetamine does not reduce its ability to produce conditioned taste aversion to saccharin.

Authors:  John Scott-Railton; Gretchen Arnold; Paul Vezina
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Impact of precisely-timed inhibition of gustatory cortex on taste behavior depends on single-trial ensemble dynamics.

Authors:  Narendra Mukherjee; Joseph Wachutka; Donald B Katz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Taste reactivity and consumption measures in the assessment of overshadowing: Modulation of aversive, but not ingestive, reactivity.

Authors:  T E Thiele; S W Kiefer; S A Bailey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-06

7.  Interaction of Taste and Place Coding in the Hippocampus.

Authors:  Linnea E Herzog; Leila May Pascual; Seneca J Scott; Elon R Mathieson; Donald B Katz; Shantanu P Jadhav
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effect of combined doses of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) on acute and anticipatory nausea using rat (Sprague- Dawley) models of conditioned gaping.

Authors:  Erin M Rock; Cheryl L Limebeer; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Conditioned taste aversion, drugs of abuse and palatability.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Joe Arthurs; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Forebrain neurons that project to the gustatory parabrachial nucleus in rat lack glutamic acid decarboxylase.

Authors:  Shalini Saggu; Robert F Lundy
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.