Literature DB >> 13319659

Photoreversal of nuclear and cytoplasmic effects of short ultraviolet radiation on Paramecium caudatum.

C L BRANDT, A C GIESE.   

Abstract

1. Irradiation with three short ultraviolet (UV) wave lengths, 226, 233, and 239 mmicro rapidly immobilizes Paramecium caudatum, the dosage required being smaller the shorter the wave length. 85 per cent of paramecia immobilized with wave length 226 mmicro recover completely. Recovery from immobilizing doses is less the longer the wave length. 2. Irradiation continued after immobilization kills the paramecia in a manner which is markedly different for very short (226, 233, and 239 mmicro) and longer (267 mmicro) wave lengths. 3. An action spectrum for immobilization in P. caudatum was determined for the wave lengths 226, 233, 239, 248, and 267 mmicro, and found to resemble the absorption of protein and lipide in the wave length region below 248 mmicro. Addition of these data to those of Giese (1945 b) gives an action spectrum resembling the absorption by albumin-like protein. 4. Division of P. caudatum is delayed by doses of wave lengths 226, 233, and 239 mmicro which cause immobilization, the longest wave length being most effective. 5. Immobilization at any of the wave lengths tested (226, 233, 239, 248, 267 mmicro) is not photoreversible when UV-treated paramecia are concurrently illuminated. 6. Division delay resulting from immobilizing doses of 226, 233, and 239 mmicro is photoreversible by exposure to visible light concurrently with the UV. 7. Division delay induced by exposure to wave length 267 mmicro is reduced by exposure to visible light applied concurrently with UV or immediately afterwards. 8. The data suggest that the shortest UV wave length tested (226 mmicro) affects the cytoplasm selectively, because it is absorbed superficially as indicated by unilateral fluorescence in UV. Consequently it immobilizes paramecia rapidly but has little effect on the division rate because little radiation reaches the nucleus. 9. The data support the view that nuclear effects of UV are readily photoreversed but cytoplasmic effects are not.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CILIATA/effect of radiations on; LIGHT/effects; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS/effects

Mesh:

Year:  1956        PMID: 13319659      PMCID: PMC2147556          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.39.5.735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  14 in total

1.  Division delay by radiation and nitrogen mustard in Paramecium.

Authors:  R F KIMBALL; R P GECKLER; N GAITHER
Journal:  J Cell Comp Physiol       Date:  1952-12

2.  Photoreactivation of ultraviolet light injury in gametes of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

Authors:  P H WELLS; A C GIESE
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 1.818

3.  The influence of light upon the action of ultraviolet on Paramecium aurelia.

Authors:  R F KIMBALL; N GAITHER
Journal:  J Cell Comp Physiol       Date:  1951-04

4.  The action spectrum of the inhibition of galactozymase production by ultraviolet light.

Authors:  P A SWENSON
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Action of ultraviolet radiation on protoplasm.

Authors:  A C GIESE
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Experiments on light-reactivation of ultra-violet inactivated bacteria.

Authors:  A NOVICK; L SZILARD
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1949-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The accelerating action of illumination in recovery of Arbacia eggs from exposure to ultraviolet radiation.

Authors:  H F BLUM; G M LOOS; J C ROBINSON
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1950-11       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  A comparison of five effects of ultraviolet light on the Arbacia egg.

Authors:  H F BLUM; J S COOK; G M LOOS
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1954-01-20       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  The loci of action of ultraviolet and x-radiation and of photorecovery in the egg and sperm of the sea urchin Arbacia punctulata.

Authors:  H F BLUM; J C ROBINSON; G M LOOS
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  The effect of nutritional state on photoreversal of ultraviolet injuries in Didinium nasutum.

Authors:  C L BRANDT; D C SHEPARD; A C GIESE
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1955-01-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  5 in total

1.  Photoreactivation of induced mutation and inactivation of Escherichia coli exposed to various wave lengths of monochromatic ultraviolet radiation.

Authors:  M R ZELLE; J E OGG; A HOLLAENDER
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1958-02       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Resetting the Biological Clock in Gonyaulax with Ultraviolet Light.

Authors:  B M Sweeney
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Enterococci in the environment.

Authors:  Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli; Meredith B Nevers; Asja Korajkic; Zachery R Staley; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Photoreactivation in vitro of ultraviolet-inactivated Hemophilus influenzae transforming factor.

Authors:  C S RUPERT; S H GOODGAL; R M HERRIOTT
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1958-01-20       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Retardation of division of three ciliates by intermittent and continuous ultraviolet radiations at different temperatures.

Authors:  A C GIESE; B McCAW; R CORNELL
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1963-05       Impact factor: 4.086

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.