Literature DB >> 1330139

Conversion relations for quantitative CT bone mineral densities measured with solid and liquid calibration standards.

M M Goodsitt1.   

Abstract

A vast data base exists for QCT measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) referenced to K2HPO4 in water (liquid) standards. To effectively utilize the more stable hydroxyapatite in water-equivalent plastic (solid) standards that have recently been introduced, it will be necessary to derive conversion relations. A study was performed to investigate the dependence of these relations upon x-ray tube voltage, marrow composition, and patient body size. Test objects included five diverse composition vertebral marrow inserts within three different size lumbar simulators and an L1 vertebra within a Humanoid phantom. The calibration standards were manufactured by Image Analysis, and all data were acquired with a GE 9800 CT scanner operated at 80 kVp and 140 kVp. Least square fits to corresponding liquid versus solid referenced BMD measurements of the inserts all had r's > 0.999. SEEs, < 2 mg/ml, and intercepts of approximately 0. The slopes (BMDK2HPO4/BMDhydroxyapatite) for the various body sizes were all about the same with values of 0.86, 0.81, and 0.96 to 1.02 for the single-energy@80 kVp, single-energy@140 kVp, and dual-energy measurements, respectively. Corresponding ratios for the Humanoid vertebra were 0.86, 0.82, and 0.96. The conversion relations were essentially independent of marrow composition and body size but did depend upon kVp. Finally, although the solid standards are more stable, they may still exhibit problems, and these are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1330139     DOI: 10.1016/0169-6009(92)90922-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Miner        ISSN: 0169-6009


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Application of polychromatic µCT for mineral density determination.

Authors:  W Zou; N Hunter; M V Swain
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Changes in calibration standards for quantitative computed tomography: recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  C C Glüer; K Engelke; M Jergas; S Hagiwara; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Novel anthropomorphic hip phantom corrects systemic interscanner differences in proximal femoral vBMD.

Authors:  S Bonaretti; R D Carpenter; I Saeed; A J Burghardt; L Yu; M Bruesewitz; S Khosla; T Lang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores.

Authors:  B C C Khoo; K Brown; C Cann; K Zhu; S Henzell; V Low; S Gustafsson; R I Price; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  CTXA hip--an extension of classical DXA measurements using quantitative CT.

Authors:  Christopher E Cann; Judith E Adams; J Keenan Brown; Alan D Brett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.