Literature DB >> 1308755

The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: I. Description of methods and populations.

M M Cohen1, P G Duncan, W A Tweed, D Biehl, W D Pope, M Perry, R N Merchant.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were first to develop and institute a methodology for the study of anaesthetic outcome for parallel use in four teaching hospitals in Canada and second, to compare rates of morbidity and mortality associated with anaesthesia between the four centres. The basic design of the study was occurrence screening with anaesthetists entering data on patient demographics, anaesthetic and surgical factors. Research nurses reviewed anaesthetic records and hospital charts and interviewed patients postoperatively. Data on 37,665 anaesthetics were collected during 1988-89 in the four teaching centres. There were major differences found across the hospitals, particularly with regard to volume, patient case-mix, anaesthetic drugs and monitoring used. The use of parallel training, repeated consultations and use of rounds and inservices contributed to the reliability and validity of the data collection. We conclude that outcome surveillance can be instituted in different hospital Departments of Anaesthesia with sufficient confidence to form the basis of comparison of anaesthetic outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1308755     DOI: 10.1007/BF03008705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  11 in total

1.  Deaths associated with anaesthesia; a report on 1,000 cases.

Authors:  G EDWARDS; H J MORTON; E A PASK; W D WYLIE
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1956-07       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Reliability of ratings of anesthesia's contribution to adverse surgical outcomes.

Authors:  D A Revicki; D N Klaucke; R E Brown; R A Caplan
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1990-11

3.  Anaesthetic mortality in New South Wales.

Authors:  R Holland
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Hospital inpatient mortality. Is it a predictor of quality?

Authors:  R W Dubois; W H Rogers; J H Moxley; D Draper; R H Brook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Complications associated with anaesthesia--a prospective survey in France.

Authors:  L Tiret; J M Desmonts; F Hatton; G Vourc'h
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-05

Review 6.  Efficacy, effectiveness, variations, and quality. Boundary-crossing research.

Authors:  R H Brook; K N Lohr
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Peer reviewer agreement for major anesthetic mishaps.

Authors:  R A Caplan; K Posner; R J Ward; F W Cheney
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1988-12

Review 8.  Outcome measurement: concepts and questions.

Authors:  K N Lohr
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Does anesthesia contribute to operative mortality?

Authors:  M M Cohen; P G Duncan; R B Tate
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Differences among hospitals in Medicare patient mortality.

Authors:  M R Chassin; R E Park; K N Lohr; J Keesey; R H Brook
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: II. Can outcomes be used to assess the quality of anaesthesia care?

Authors:  M M Cohen; P G Duncan; W D Pope; D Biehl; W A Tweed; L MacWilliam; R N Merchant
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Validation of routine incidence reporting of one anaesthesia provider institution within a nation-wide quality of process assessment program.

Authors:  U Bothner; M Georgieff; B Schwilk
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: III. Are anaesthetic complications predictable in day surgical practice?

Authors:  P G Duncan; M M Cohen; W A Tweed; D Biehl; W D Pope; R N Merchant; D DeBoer
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes.

Authors:  P H Norman; M D Daley
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Assessing discomfort after anaesthesia: should you ask the patient or read the record?

Authors:  M M Cohen; P G Duncan; D P DeBoer
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-09

6.  Critical incident reporting in anaesthesia: a prospective internal audit.

Authors:  Sunanda Gupta; Udita Naithani; Saroj Kumar Brajesh; Vikrant Singh Pathania; Apoorva Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-08

7.  A cross-validated multifactorial index of perioperative risks in adults undergoing anaesthesia for non-cardiac surgery. Analysis of perioperative events in 26907 anaesthetic procedures.

Authors:  B Schwilk; R Muche; H Treiber; A Brinkmann; M Georgieff; U Bothner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 8.  Technology assessment of anaesthesia monitors: problems and future directions.

Authors:  R J Byrick; M M Cohen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Critical incidents during anesthesia in a developing country: A retrospective audit.

Authors:  A O Amucheazi; O V Ajuzieogu
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2010 Jul-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.