Literature DB >> 1299455

Do the pictures influence scores on the Dartmouth COOP Charts?

C O Larson1, R D Hays, E C Nelson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of illustrations on COOP Chart responses. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized split-half design of 177 patients discharged from a medical centre during a 3 month interval. Patient responses were obtained. However, there are benefits from the use of illustrations. Further research measures. Demographic characteristics and health status.
RESULTS: No response differences were observed between patients who received COOP Chart illustrations and those who did not receive illustrations.
CONCLUSION: Pictures do not appear to affect responses to COOP Charts. However there are benefits of the use of illustrations. Also, further research should be conducted with other patient populations and other COOP Charts before conclusive statements can be made regarding the use of illustrations with the COOP Charts.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1299455     DOI： 10.1007/bf00435633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN： 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  8 in total

1.  Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings. The clinician's point of view. The Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project.

Authors:  J Wasson; A Keller; L Rubenstein; R Hays; E Nelson; D Johnson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Effects of number of rating scale points upon utilities in a quality of well-being scale.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; M Debon; B F Anderson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; W Rogers; A E Raczek; J F Lu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Reliability and validity of drug use items differing in the nature of their response options.

Authors:  R D Hays; G J Huba
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-06

5.  Improving task comprehension in the measurement of health state preferences. A trial of informational cartoon figures and a paired-comparison task.

Authors:  D C Hadorn; R D Hays; J Uebersax; T Hauber
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  The functional status of patients. How can it be measured in physicians' offices?

Authors:  E C Nelson; J M Landgraf; R D Hays; J H Wasson; J W Kirk
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Nature of questionnaire options affects estimates of alcohol intake.

Authors:  K Poikolainen; P Kärkkäinen
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1985-05

8.  Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings.

Authors:  E Nelson; J Wasson; J Kirk; A Keller; D Clark; A Dietrich; A Stewart; M Zubkoff
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987
  8 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Measuring health status with the Dartmouth COOP charts in low-functioning elderly. Do the illustrations affect the outcomes?

Authors:  G I Kempen; E van Sonderen; R Sanderman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  COOP Charts in French: translation and preliminary data on instrument properties.

Authors:  T V Perneger; A Leplège; H Guillain; E Ecosse; J F Etter
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Favorable effects of explanatory illustrations attached to a self-administered questionnaire for upper extremity disorders.

Authors:  Shigeru Kurimoto; Michiro Yamamoto; Takaaki Shinohara; Masahiro Tatebe; Iwatsuki Katsuyuki; Hitoshi Hirata
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Assessment of the COOP charts with and without pictures in a Swiss population.

Authors:  T V Perneger; E Chamot; J F Etter; J L Richard; S Gallant; P Ricciardi; A Iten; B Burnand
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The Dartmouth COOP Charts: a simple, reliable, valid and responsive quality of life tool for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  T Eaton; P Young; W Fergusson; J E Garrett; J Kolbe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Design of, and enrollment in, the palliative care communication research initiative: a direct-observation cohort study.

Authors:  Robert Gramling; Elizabeth Gajary-Coots; Susan Stanek; Nathalie Dougoud; Heather Pyke; Marie Thomas; Jenica Cimino; Mechelle Sanders; Stewart C Alexander; Ronald Epstein; Kevin Fiscella; David Gramling; Susan Ladwig; Wendy Anderson; Stephen Pantilat; Sally A Norton
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.234
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.