Literature DB >> 12974581

A faster method for 3D/2D medical image registration--a simulation study.

Wolfgang Birkfellner1, Joachim Wirth, Wolfgang Burgstaller, Bernard Baumann, Harald Staedele, Beat Hammer, Niels Claudius Gellrich, Augustinus Ludwig Jacob, Pietro Regazzoni, Peter Messmer.   

Abstract

3D/2D patient-to-computed-tomography (CT) registration is a method to determine a transformation that maps two coordinate systems by comparing a projection image rendered from CT to a real projection image. Iterative variation of the CT's position between rendering steps finally leads to exact registration. Applications include exact patient positioning in radiation therapy, calibration of surgical robots, and pose estimation in computer-aided surgery. One of the problems associated with 3D/2D registration is the fact that finding a registration includes solving a minimization problem in six degrees of freedom (dof) in motion. This results in considerable time requirements since for each iteration step at least one volume rendering has to be computed. We show that by choosing an appropriate world coordinate system and by applying a 2D/2D registration method in each iteration step, the number of iterations can be grossly reduced from n6 to n5. Here, n is the number of discrete variations around a given coordinate. Depending on the configuration of the optimization algorithm, this reduces the total number of iterations necessary to at least 1/3 of it's original value. The method was implemented and extensively tested on simulated x-ray images of a tibia, a pelvis and a skull base. When using one projective image and a discrete full parameter space search for solving the optimization problem, average accuracy was found to be 1.0 +/- 0.6(degrees) and 4.1 +/- 1.9 (mm) for a registration in six parameters, and 1.0 +/- 0.7(degrees) and 4.2 +/- 1.6 (mm) when using the 5 + 1 dof method described in this paper. Time requirements were reduced by a factor 3.1. We conclude that this hardware-independent optimization of 3D/2D registration is a step towards increasing the acceptance of this promising method for a wide number of clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12974581     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/16/307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Automated 2D-3D registration of portal images and CT data using line-segment enhancement.

Authors:  Reshma Munbodh; Zhe Chen; David A Jaffray; Douglas J Moseley; Jonathan P S Knisely; James S Duncan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Validation for 2D/3D registration. II: The comparison of intensity- and gradient-based merit functions using a new gold standard data set.

Authors:  Christelle Gendrin; Primoz Markelj; Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro; Jakob Spoerk; Christoph Bloch; Christoph Weber; Michael Figl; Helmar Bergmann; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Bostjan Likar; Franjo Pernus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Stochastic rank correlation: a robust merit function for 2D/3D registration of image data obtained at different energies.

Authors:  Wolfgang Birkfellner; Markus Stock; Michael Figl; Christelle Gendrin; Johann Hummel; Shuo Dong; Joachim Kettenbach; Dietmar Georg; Helmar Bergmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Clinical Assessment of 2D/3D Registration Accuracy in 4 Major Anatomic Sites Using On-Board 2D Kilovoltage Images for 6D Patient Setup.

Authors:  Guang Li; T Jonathan Yang; Hugo Furtado; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Åse Ballangrud; Simon N Powell; James Mechalakos
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-15

5.  Robust 3D-2D image registration: application to spine interventions and vertebral labeling in the presence of anatomical deformation.

Authors:  Yoshito Otake; Adam S Wang; J Webster Stayman; Ali Uneri; Gerhard Kleinszig; Sebastian Vogt; A Jay Khanna; Ziya L Gokaslan; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Validation for 2D/3D registration. I: A new gold standard data set.

Authors:  S A Pawiro; P Markelj; F Pernus; C Gendrin; M Figl; C Weber; F Kainberger; I Nöbauer-Huhmann; H Bergmeister; M Stock; D Georg; H Bergmann; W Birkfellner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.