BACKGROUND: The objectives of the current study were to determine the outcome of children who were treated withchemotherapy and radiotherapyon the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) high-grade glioma protocol (CCG-945) who were diagnosed with low-grade gliomas on post hoc central pathologic review and to identify clinical and biologic features associated with prognosis. METHODS:Between 1985 and 1991, 250 children with institutionally classified high-grade gliomas were enrolled on CCG-945. Patients older than 24 months with intracranial lesions were assigned randomly to receive either lomustine, vincristine, and prednisone (control regimen) or the 8-drugs-in-1-day regimen (experimental regimen); younger patients and those with primary spinal cord tumors were assigned nonrandomly to the experimental regimen. Central independent review by 5 neuropathologists led to a reclassification of low-grade glioma in 70 patients, who were the focus of the current study. RESULTS: The study involved 42 males and 28 females (median age, 7.7 years) with a median follow-up of 10.4 years. At 5 years, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 63% +/- 6%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 79% +/- 5%, compared with a PFS rate of 19% +/- 3% (P < 0.0001) and an OS rate of 22% +/- 3% (P < 0.0001) in the remainder of the cohort. Significantly poorer 5-year PFS was seen in children younger than 24 months, those with fibrillary astrocytoma, and those with posterior fossa tumors. Patients demonstrated a modest improvement in PFS but no improvement in OS compared with children with low-grade gliomas who were treated with contemporary chemotherapy-alone approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The current report calls attention to the importance of central pathologic review in large multiinstitutional trials of children with gliomas and suggests that aggressive front-line combined chemoradiotherapy does not confer a survival advantage in this highly selected population of patients. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11637
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The objectives of the current study were to determine the outcome of children who were treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy on the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) high-grade glioma protocol (CCG-945) who were diagnosed with low-grade gliomas on post hoc central pathologic review and to identify clinical and biologic features associated with prognosis. METHODS: Between 1985 and 1991, 250 children with institutionally classified high-grade gliomas were enrolled on CCG-945. Patients older than 24 months with intracranial lesions were assigned randomly to receive either lomustine, vincristine, and prednisone (control regimen) or the 8-drugs-in-1-day regimen (experimental regimen); younger patients and those with primary spinal cord tumors were assigned nonrandomly to the experimental regimen. Central independent review by 5 neuropathologists led to a reclassification of low-grade glioma in 70 patients, who were the focus of the current study. RESULTS: The study involved 42 males and 28 females (median age, 7.7 years) with a median follow-up of 10.4 years. At 5 years, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 63% +/- 6%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 79% +/- 5%, compared with a PFS rate of 19% +/- 3% (P < 0.0001) and an OS rate of 22% +/- 3% (P < 0.0001) in the remainder of the cohort. Significantly poorer 5-year PFS was seen in children younger than 24 months, those with fibrillary astrocytoma, and those with posterior fossa tumors. Patients demonstrated a modest improvement in PFS but no improvement in OS compared with children with low-grade gliomas who were treated with contemporary chemotherapy-alone approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The current report calls attention to the importance of central pathologic review in large multiinstitutional trials of children with gliomas and suggests that aggressive front-line combined chemoradiotherapy does not confer a survival advantage in this highly selected population of patients. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11637
Authors: Andrea Maria Cappellano; Antonio Sergio Petrilli; Nasjla Saba da Silva; Frederico Adolfo Silva; Priscila Mendes Paiva; Sergio Cavalheiro; Eric Bouffet Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Eric Bouffet; Jeffrey C Allen; James M Boyett; Allen Yates; Floyd Gilles; Peter C Burger; Richard L Davis; Laurence E Becker; Ian F Pollack; Jonathan L Finlay Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Ruth G Tatevossian; Bo Tang; James Dalton; Tim Forshew; Andrew R Lawson; Jing Ma; Geoff Neale; Sheila A Shurtleff; Simon Bailey; Amar Gajjar; Suzanne J Baker; Denise Sheer; David W Ellison Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Michael J Fisher; Michael Loguidice; David H Gutmann; Robert Listernick; Rosalie E Ferner; Nicole J Ullrich; Roger J Packer; Uri Tabori; Robert O Hoffman; Simone L Ardern-Holmes; Trent R Hummel; Darren R Hargrave; Eric Bouffet; Joel Charrow; Larissa T Bilaniuk; Laura J Balcer; Grant T Liu Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Guillaume Bergthold; Pratiti Bandopadhayay; Wenya Linda Bi; Lori Ramkissoon; Charles Stiles; Rosalind A Segal; Rameen Beroukhim; Keith L Ligon; Jacques Grill; Mark W Kieran Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2014-02-28