OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) therapy on infarct size and left ventricular function when used as an adjuvant therapy to primary angioplasty. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING:Cardiac intensive care unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-seven patients with acute myocardial infarction for whom primary angioplasty was indicated. INTERVENTIONS:Eligible patients were randomized by a blinded pharmacist to GIK solution (30% glucose in water with insulin 50 U/L, and KCl 40 mM/L) vs. placebo at 1.5 mL/kg/hr for 24 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Tc 99m sestamibi myocardial scintigraphy was performed at admission and at 3 months. Primary end points were the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the size of salvaged myocardium. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. At the 3-month follow-up, a significant overall decrease in infarct size (37 +/- 16% vs. 12 +/- 10%, p <.005) and an increase in LVEF (34 +/- 13% vs. 49 +/- 9%, p =.005) were observed. Patients randomized to GIK solution experienced a significant increase in their LVEF at 3 months (39 +/- 12 to 51 +/- 13, p =.002). Patients who received placebo had no significant differences between baseline and 3-month measurements (44 +/- 13 vs. 49 +/- 14, p = NS). There was a trend toward an increase in myocardial salvage in the GIK group, which did not reach statistical significance. When patients from both groups were compared directly, differences in LVEF improvement were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS:GIK solution did not improve LVEF or decrease the infarct size among patients undergoing primary angioplasty.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) therapy on infarct size and left ventricular function when used as an adjuvant therapy to primary angioplasty. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Cardiac intensive care unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-seven patients with acute myocardial infarction for whom primary angioplasty was indicated. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients were randomized by a blinded pharmacist to GIK solution (30% glucose in water with insulin 50 U/L, and KCl 40 mM/L) vs. placebo at 1.5 mL/kg/hr for 24 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Tc 99m sestamibi myocardial scintigraphy was performed at admission and at 3 months. Primary end points were the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the size of salvaged myocardium. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. At the 3-month follow-up, a significant overall decrease in infarct size (37 +/- 16% vs. 12 +/- 10%, p <.005) and an increase in LVEF (34 +/- 13% vs. 49 +/- 9%, p =.005) were observed. Patients randomized to GIK solution experienced a significant increase in their LVEF at 3 months (39 +/- 12 to 51 +/- 13, p =.002). Patients who received placebo had no significant differences between baseline and 3-month measurements (44 +/- 13 vs. 49 +/- 14, p = NS). There was a trend toward an increase in myocardial salvage in the GIK group, which did not reach statistical significance. When patients from both groups were compared directly, differences in LVEF improvement were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: GIK solution did not improve LVEF or decrease the infarct size among patients undergoing primary angioplasty.
Authors: Ik-Kyung Jang; Veronica Pettigrew; Michael H Picard; Peter R Kowey; Valentin Demmel; Michael R Zile; Jun Tatsuno; Frans J Th Wackers; Mark Hibberd Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Nihat Kalay; Ibrahim Ozdogru; Ali Gul; Yilmaz Yucel; Yakup Cetinkaya; Mehmet Tugrul Inanc; Ali Dogan; Mehmet Gungor Kaya; Namýk Kemal Eryol Journal: Exp Clin Cardiol Date: 2008
Authors: Iwan C C van der Horst; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Arnoud W J van 't Hof; Stoffer Reiffers; Kor Miedema; Jan C A Hoorntje; Jan-Henk E Dambrink; A T Marcel Gosselink; Maarten W N Nijsten; Harry Suryapranata; Menko-Jan de Boer; Felix Zijlstra Journal: BMC Med Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 8.775