Literature DB >> 12973155

Impact of neck and arm pain on overall health status.

Scott D Daffner1, Alan S Hilibrand, Brett S Hanscom, Brian T Brislin, Alexander R Vaccaro, Todd J Albert.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional analysis of data from the National Spine Network database.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the relative impact of radicular and axial symptoms associated with disease of the cervical spine on general health as measured by the SF-36 Health Survey, and to compare the impact of these symptoms among patients of varying age and symptom duration.
BACKGROUND: Degenerative disorders of the cervical spine can cause debilitating symptoms of neck and arm pain. Physicians generally treat radiculopathy more aggressively than axial neck pain alone, although it has never been shown that the presence of radiculopathy leads to a greater impairment of physical and mental function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: SF-36 Health Survey data were collected from all consenting patients seen within the National Spine Network. Patients with symptoms referable to the cervical spine (as per their physician) were included (n = 1,809). SF-36 scores for all eight scales (bodily pain (BP), vitality (VT), general health (GH), mental health (MH), physical function (PF), role physical (RP), role emotional (RE), and social function (SF), and two summary scales (Physical Component Summary [PCS] and Mental Component Summary [MCS]) were calculated. Age/gender normative scores were subtracted from the scale scores to produce a negative "impact" score, which reflected how far below normal health status these patients were. Patients were grouped according to location of symptoms (axial only, radicular only, or axial and radicular), age (younger than 40, 40 to 60, and older than 60 years), and symptom duration (acute: <6 wk; subacute: 6 wk-6 mo; and chronic: >6 mo). SF-36 scores were compared between all groups using analysis of variance and multiple comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment.
RESULTS: Patients who presented with both axial and radicular symptoms had the lowest SF-36 scores relative to age and gender norms. These scores were significantly lower than those for patients with only axial or only radicular symptoms across all eight subscales (P < 0.05- P < 0.0001). Scores for patients with only axial pain were significantly lower than for patients with only radicular pain for VT (P < 0.04) and GH (P < 0.004). Patients younger than 40 and those between ages 40 to 60 years were significantly more impacted by their symptoms than patients older than 60 years for all eight scales (P < 0.01). PCS scores were similar for acute, subacute, and chronic groups, whereas MCS scores were significantly worse for patients with chronic pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined neck and arm pain were much more disabling than either symptom alone. Younger patients (younger than 40 or 40-60) were more affected by these symptoms than patients older than 60 years. In addition, as symptom duration increased, a negative impact on mental health was observed, although chronic symptoms did not affect physical health. This study suggests that patients with a significant component of axial pain in conjunction with cervical radiculopathy should be considered the most affected of all patients with cervical spondylosis. Given the evidence that the treatment methods at the disposal of physicians are effective, this study suggests that prompt treatment of these patients may help avoid the harmful effects of chronic symptoms on mental functioning, especially among younger patients who were found to be more impacted by the symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12973155     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083325.27357.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  48 in total

1.  Neck pain patients' preference scores for their current health.

Authors:  Gabrielle van der Velde; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Pierre Côté; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Eric L Hurwitz; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Chronic mechanical neck pain in adults treated by manual therapy: a systematic review of change scores in randomized controlled trials of a single session.

Authors:  Howard Vernon; Barry Kim Humphreys
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

3.  Group-based exercise at workplace: short-term effects of neck and shoulder resistance training in video display unit workers with work-related chronic neck pain-a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Giuseppa M Caputo; Mauro Di Bari; José Naranjo Orellana
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature.

Authors:  René Fejer; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik; Jan Hartvigsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Reliability of a seated three-dimensional passive intervertebral motion test for mobility, end-feel, and pain provocation in patients with cervicalgia.

Authors:  Dana M Manning; Gregory S Dedrick; Phillip S Sizer; Jean-Michel Brismée
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-08

6.  The sequential recovery of health status after tibial plafond fractures.

Authors:  J Lawrence Marsh; Todd McKinley; Douglas Dirschl; Andrew Pick; Geoffrey Haft; Donald D Anderson; Thomas Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  The immediate effects of soft tissue mobilization versus therapeutic ultrasound for patients with neck and arm pain with evidence of neural mechanosensitivity: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael Costello; Emilio 'Louie' J Puentedura; Josh Cleland; Charles D Ciccone
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-07

8.  Effect of neck strength training on health-related quality of life in females with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Petri K Salo; Arja H Häkkinen; Hannu Kautiainen; Jari J Ylinen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Clinical outcomes of epidural neuroplasty for cervical disc herniation.

Authors:  Eun Jung Park; Sun Young Park; Se Jin Lee; Nan Seol Kim; Do Yle Koh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Validation of a novel sham cervical manipulation procedure.

Authors:  Howard T Vernon; John J Triano; James K Ross; Steven K Tran; David M Soave; Maricelle D Dinulos
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.