Literature DB >> 1297010

Effect of radiographic landmark identification errors on the accuracy of three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine.

B André1, J Dansereau, H Labelle.   

Abstract

In three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine obtained from stereo-radiographic set-ups (two radiographs or more), it is extremely difficult to identify exactly the same landmarks on all radiographs. The effect of these identification errors was investigated with simulations made on points of known three-dimensional co-ordinates and compared with three-dimensional reconstructions of real spines obtained with the direct linear transformation algorithm. Results showed that radiographic identification errors of up to 2 mm were common, causing reconstruction errors of up to 5 mm. These reconstruction errors may be noticed in the form of geometrical inaccuracies in the graphical representation of three-dimensional reconstructions of the spine. Successive displacements were then imposed on image point co-ordinates to minimise the identification error and increase the reconstruction accuracy. The improvement on the three-dimensional reconstruction results was negligible. Three-dimensional reconstructions obtained from three radiographs were also investigated. They showed slightly more accurate reconstructions than those obtained from two radiographs. However, the increase of X-ray exposure on the patient may not be worthwhile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1297010     DOI: 10.1007/bf02446787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  10 in total

1.  Digital radiography can reduce scoliosis x-ray exposure.

Authors:  T F Kling; M J Cohen; R E Lindseth; G P De Rosa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Kinematic analysis of spinal fusions.

Authors:  T H Olsson; G Selvik; S Willner
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique.

Authors:  R H Brown; A H Burstein; C L Nash; C C Schock
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Measurements of the three-dimensional shape of the rib cage.

Authors:  J Dansereau; I A Stokes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The accuracy of DLT extrapolation in three-dimensional film analysis.

Authors:  G A Wood; R N Marshall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion.

Authors:  M J Pearcy
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1985

7.  Measurement of movement in painful intervertebral joints.

Authors:  I A Stokes; P A Medlicott; D G Wilder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Analysis of changes in the scoliotic spine using a three-dimensional radiographic technique.

Authors:  J Hindmarsh; J Larsson; O Mattsson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Three-dimensional spinal curvature in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  I A Stokes; L C Bigalow; M S Moreland
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  The top view for analysis of scoliosis progression.

Authors:  A A De Smet; M A Tarlton; L T Cook; A S Berridge; M A Asher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 11.105

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereocorresponding points and elastic deformable meshes.

Authors:  D Mitton; C Landry; S Véron; W Skalli; F Lavaste; J A De Guise
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Variability of the spine and pelvis location with respect to the gravity line: a three-dimensional stereoradiographic study using a force platform.

Authors:  N Gangnet; V Pomero; R Dumas; W Skalli; J-M Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Morphometric evaluations of personalised 3D reconstructions and geometric models of the human spine.

Authors:  C E Aubin; J Dansereau; F Parent; H Labelle; J A de Guise
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Approach for the smoothing of three-dimensional reconstructions of the human spine using dual Kriging interpolation.

Authors:  B André; F Trochu; J Dansereau
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Variability of geometric measurements from three-dimensional reconstructions of scoliotic spines and rib cages.

Authors:  H Labelle; J Dansereau; C Bellefleur; J C Jéquier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Three-dimensional easy morphological (3-DEMO) classification of scoliosis, part I.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Alberto Negrini; Salvatore Atanasio; Giorgio C Santambrogio
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-12-05

9.  A versatile 3D reconstruction system of the spine and pelvis for clinical assessment of spinal deformities.

Authors:  Samuel Kadoury; Farida Cheriet; Catherine Laporte; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 3.079

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.